Re: Global Warming; The biggest scam of all time


Billy wrote:
> "PerfectlyAble" <jrhw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1135469107.101526.70150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Leftists = traitors wrote:
> >
> >> 1. It seems to be happening, though there are microclimactic
> >> exceptions to the evidence.
> >
> > I heard that as the artic ice shrinks, plants move in and
> > like all organisms alter their environment to suit themselves.
> > So they actually accerate the warming. So the whole idea
> > of trapping carbon may actually not work, for as we retrap
> > carbon we actually accelerate warming.
>
>
> >
> >> 2. We don't know if it's man made, nature produced or a natural cycle.
> >
> > Oh, if you push a rock off a high cliff and it smashes a house
> > killing people, you'd expect people would say they didn't.
> > That it was going to happen anyway right? Denial doesn't work.
>
> What the hell are you talking about

The first thing you expect people to say when they are told
its them causing the bad weather!

>
> >
> >> 3. Controlling pollution in the West while the East has no controls
> >> (China is now the largest industrial producer on Earth and
> >> second-largest polluter) is a pathetic joke. Kyoto is a joke.
> >
> > Irrelevent. Why is it a joke? Attempting to manage carbon
> > emissions is a good idea. Even if it doesn't work, even if
> > there were no greenhouse gas problem, carbon credits would
> > be a viable means of growing the world economy. Putting
> > money in the hands of poor farmers to grow trees, manage
> > environments, etc. Its a win even without the pending doom
> > merchants. Kyoto is still a good thing.
>
> Spending billions to make thousands, you are not an economics major are you?

>>From the class of Americian dipshits that swallow whole the
virtues of corporate welfare, I think I take my lessons elsewhere,
from others.

>
>
> >
> >> 4. Destroying the economy of the West will result in FAR MORE
> >> pollution in the future as money for advanced pollution controls will
> >> not be available.
> >
> > I disagree. China is going to expand anyway. Capitalism
> > thrives on competition, it makes us work harder and smarter.
> > I believe competition with China will make us richer, as
> > we can shift people from dumb *** work to more useful
> > thinking jobs. Althought that might be a problem for the
> > denialistic midwestern religious freaks who live by the
> > word of dogma (am god backwards).
>
> Destroying the economy in the west is going to make us stronger, and you
> call the people in the midwest in denial!!!

You have to destroy to build. It is a fact. Why do you see
Bushites rubbishing liberals all the time. They are clearing
shrub for more Bush.

> >
> >> 5. The East does not care about pollution the way the West does. Many
> >> Third World cities are unlivable.
> >
> > Funny thing about the East, as they get rich, they grow a middle
> > class that is liberal and starts wanting their kids not to get
> > cancer, asthma, theor house prices to rise when the polluting
> > factories are moved else where.
>
> What are you saying when people get more money than they know what to do
> with, they become liberal and get stupid?

Something completely stupid about Bushites, is that they
believe liberalism is nice yet so hate it vehemently.
Puzzled? Solution: Bushites are gormless.
LIberals are self-centre greedly little tightwads,
they are the corner stone of capitalism, freeingup
capital from the rich and reinvesting in the poor
when and only when necessary. Your modern
Bu*** believes all he need do is hand your taxes
over to a bunch of jesus freaks and poverty will magically
disappear until the next financial year starts.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Fact is people want to advance their own cause,
selfishness is valued by capitalism, not to by the
Bu*** national christian socialists.
It I want to get rich, one way to do so is to stop
big business site-ing a nuke power plant in by backyard
that trashes house prices. As people get rich, they
have more economic power to re-direct pollution to
stupid people (like Americians who have to pay their
own health coverage). Ever noticed how liberal Europe
is very pleasent and America has lax pollution controls.
Yep, you guess it, America is now growingup. Shafting
the Chinese with all the base industries and ensuing pollution
problems. But wait there still a core of stupid America
who believe pissing on your own head is great news.
Lordy lordy how feckless.

>
> >
> >> 6. The are POSITIVE benefits for the Northern Hemisphere from a
> >> warming globe that the scientists and politicians avoid talking about.
> >
> > Beware what you wish for. Accelarating warming may bring forward
> > the next ice age.
>
> Now you want us to worry about the next ice age, you liberal dumb asses,
> just want to worry about something.

LOL. Yeah, you know its cyclical yet can't gonk it.
How bu***-ian.
>
> >
> >> 7. ALL instances of warming in the past have positively benefited the
> >> World.
> >
> > Disagree. Not if you lived in the lush N.Africa 2,000 years ago.
> > Roman fell in part because the crops failed in the bread basket
> > of N.Africa.
>
> and my grandpa got a sunburn one day.
>
> >
> >> 8. ALL instances of global cooling have negatively affected the
> >> planet's living organisms.
> >
> > I disagree. Obviously you're just saying that because you
> > think it would help your rant.
>
> Yet you offer nothing to support your lame agrument either

LOL.

>
> >
> >> 9. We've had at least 20 ice ages in the past, about every 20k-25k
> >> years. It's a reasonable assumption we'll have another. What if
> >> global warming can help mitigate some of the negative effects of an ice
> >> age and we stop global warming now? Do glaciers down to South Carolina
> >> sound good?
> >
> > Ice accumalates cyclically in the artic. So what your suggesting
> > is if we increase the speed at which water is liftedup from the
> > equatorial regions and transported to the Northern extremes to
> > be deposited as snow this will slow the next iceages arrival.
> > Please wakeup, once the earth has warmed, the processes
> > that were reducing ice at the poles will cease (i.e. storms
> > taking warmth north) and the processes that deposit ice
> > will be enhanced.
> > Think of it like this, opening the fridge door is making your
> > ice melt, once you stop burning carbon and shut the door
> > you cease warming and the old processes of cooling set in
> > (at a much rapid pace).
> > Ever had two buckets filled with warm and hot water
> > respectively, which gets cooler faster? Once the
> > process is set in motion it gathers momentum and
> > runs on faster.
>
> Bull*** steam cools faster not hot water, your theroy sucks.

Depends but you knew that.

>
> >
> >
> >> 10. The contributions to "greenhouse gasses" by natural phenomena
> >> (ocean escape, volcanoes, forest fires, etc) are ignored by scientists
> >> whose careers hang on studying man-made contributions.
> >
> > You dig up a substance that has lay dorminent for millions
> > of years and believe it won't change the environment, HA.
>
> you must have a reading problem, he did not say anything like that.

When has anything you said mattered to my counter rant?

>
> >
> >>
> >> Are those reasons enough to at least QUESTION the validity of some of
> >> the assumptions being made by politicians and scientists with
> >> questionable agendas?
> >
> > I will agree that politics and economics play a huge part.
> > i.e. industrialists have yet to see how greenhouse issues
> > hurts their business anymore than it already has in
> > higher insurance premiums.
>
> They know how the tree hugging crowd has hurt their business.
>
> >

.

Loading