Re: May I ask an obvious question???
- From: jimpgh2002 <pmojh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:49:36 GMT
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:57:19 -0500, "Joe S." <anon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:eikpq1la44mlgepuct9r02svka56r28n2e@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:40:04 -0500, "Joe S." <anon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>If -- as the Bush junta has claimed -- they are spying only on people with
>>>Al-Qaeda connections, and if -- as the Bush junta claims -- they have
>>>spied
>>>on something like 4,000 of these evildoers -- then -- WHERE ARE THE
>>>ARRESTS?????
>>>
>> You people are SO naive.
>> If we are eavesdropping on communications, we want to
>> CONTINUE to do so and garner valuable info to stop terrorists. We
>> don't arrest the dopes we're listening to and thereby lose that
>> capability.
>
>I understand now. So when we intercept the following conversation, we do
>nothing, just continue to listen:
>
Pay attention, Joe. They can talk all they want. If they try
something, we'll know about it and stop them. In fact, we already
have. You may have noticed...no terrorist attacks since 9/11/2001.
.
- References:
- May I ask an obvious question???
- From: Joe S.
- Re: May I ask an obvious question???
- From: jimpgh2002
- Re: May I ask an obvious question???
- From: Joe S.
- May I ask an obvious question???
- Prev by Date: Re: Jobs? What jobs?
- Next by Date: Hosta Prosecutor Joseph Birkett as Anti-Constitutional "Politician" replacing Law with Politics
- Previous by thread: Re: May I ask an obvious question???
- Next by thread: Re: May I ask an obvious question???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
