Re: Here's a great question for discussing evolution with school children




Eric Brze wrote:

> On 28 Sep 2005 15:26:22 -0700, "fred" <clarma1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Eric Brze wrote:
> >> On 27 Sep 2005 18:46:22 -0700, "explorerthedog" <exp1943@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO TEACH EVOLUTION AS UNQUESTIONED TRUTH,
> >> >BECAUSE THIS ESTABLISHES ATHEISM, NOT RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >By Teaching Evolution As Unquestioned Truth, We Officially Deny That
> >> >God Created Humans; And Thus We Establish Atheism, In Effect, As Our
> >> >State Religion.
> >>
> >> What if evolution is the creation of God discovered/interpreted by
> >> scientists?
> >
> >That's a very good question. In fact, I think it would be a great
> >question for discussing evolution with gradeschool students. Don't you?
>
> In my opinion, no. I prefer to keep religious beliefs sacred. I don't
> feel the need for the teaching of God to be dragged down to the level
> of scientific study which is likely to change whenever new ideas are
> available.

Everyone has the right to sacred beliefs, not just the
religious. Yeah keep your beliefs sacred and I'll keep
mine too. However thats not the debate! Religious people
want their sacred in classrooms because they think
evolution is sacred to atheists. It isn't. Evolution is
a theory like gravity, from observation we have found that
a force acts on a body to accelerate it to the ground.
Thus if you step off a high clift you will die. Similarly
evolution is the observation of viruses swapping genetic
material. Thus we are all fearful of the next big influenza
outbreak, birdflu, because a lot of people will die.
Now I don't know about you but the theory of God has never
saved as many lives as pure unalterated scientific
investigation. I would perfer it if people like you
didn't assume your personal sacred was being dragged down
but admitted the obvious that it was quite the reverse.
Religious fabatics are trying to dumbdown science.
Keep your dirty stinking hands off independant scientific
endervours, you sick deluded theists. Where the hell
do you get off raising 'your' personal God above the
commonsense! It has nothing to do with your hocuspocus
personal views. Its about common nonspecific noncultural
education of the sciences.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: religion
    ... > at the time - but perhaps there just isn't infinity to this process. ... scientists are only just coming to deal with them. ... > I searched PBS thinking Evolution might give me a lead to what I had been ... Does evolution prove there is no God? ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Fundies worry about their own kids. Oh, the horror!
    ... humanistic setting and it is only God who will communicate that to His ... Tell me what is this science you keep refering to because it sounds ... We have observed evolution through mutation and natural selection ... scientists and propagandists with only a political or power agenda. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: A few serious Questions for the Evolutionist.
    ... does evolutionary science. ... If you showed me significant and verifiable evidence that evolution ... God did make all of this but the evidence is all fake, ... I know scientists who are Christian. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT: Atheism. (Was Re: Alter a string in multiple files?)
    ... God is an energy, in the terms of spirit or consciousness etc., ... Examples would include the evolution of modern dogs ... I'm not sure how you differentiate this from meaning 3. ... Most scientists in this field would reject the term "evolution" for ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.apps)
  • Re: WDDK
    ... And God exists. ... Evolution cannot be refuted simply because some macro ... scientists proposes), or simply because we cannot image how complexity ... or nothing in the quest to find the actual laws of nature. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)