Re: Uranium Missile Hit Pentagon on 911

Ok now with that out. Where did all the passengers and the REAL plane
go???

opinions?



On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:01:12 GMT,
"http://www.red-ice.net/specialreports/2005/07jul/kgriggspr.html";
<trolls@xxxx> wrote:

>Editorial comment: I know someone who was on Rt. 395 across from the
>Pentagon who saw a missle, not an airplane strike the Pentagon.
>
>
>High-Ranking Army
>Officer - Missile Hit Pentagon
>Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings
>Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicates
>Depleted Uranium Used.
>By Greg Szymanski
>8-19-5
>
>Two high profile radiation experts concur Pentagon strike involved use of a
>missile. Also Geiger counter readings right after the attack shows high
>levels of radiation 12 miles away from Pentagon crash site.
>
>A radiation expert and high-ranking Army Major, who once headed the
>military's depleted uranium project, both contend the Pentagon was hit by
>missile, not a commercial jetliner, adding high radiation readings after the
>strike indicate depleted uranium also may have been used.
>
>"I'm not an explosives or crash site expert, but I am highly knowledgeable
>in causes and effects related to nuclear radiation contamination. What
>happened at the Pentagon is highly suspicious, leading me to believe a
>missile with a depleted uranium warhead may have been used," said radiation
>expert Leuren Moret in a telephone conversation this week from her Berkeley,
>CA home.
>
>Moret, who has spent a life time working in the nuclear field, first as a
>staff scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory in California,
>is now a member of The Radiation and Public Health Project (RPHP), a
>privately funded group studying the devastating effects of depleted uranium
>especially in Iraq and Afghanistan.
>
>Regarding the missile theory, it is also backed up by retired Army Maj. Doug
>Rokke, a PhD educational physics and former top military expert banished
>from the Pentagon after the military failed to follow regulations regarding
>the use, clean up and medical treatment regarding the use of depleted
>uranium.
>
>"When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of
>airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the
>projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the
>work of a missile," said Maj. Rokke from his Rantoul, IL home this week.
>"And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile. Also, if you
>look at the WTC and the disturbing flash hitting the tower right before the
>impact of the airplane, it also looks like a missile was used."
>
>And to prove the government's jetliner theory is wrong, Moret said the quick
>actions of a friend near the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11, provide even
>more suspicion.
>
>Moret recalls on the tragic morning that once she saw the jetliner strike
>the twin towers and then heard about the Pentagon crash, she immediately
>called a close friend in Alexandria VA, Dr. Janette Sherman.
>
>Thinking radiation might be involved, she quickly asked Dr. Sherman, 77, a
>radiation expert and medical doctor who lived about 12 miles from the crash
>site, to get a Geiger counter reading.
>
>What the pair of experts found is astonishing. What they found is not only
>astonishing but four years after 9/11, what's even more incredible is that
>their findings have been completely ignored by most everyone, including the
>Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media, all who
>appear more interested in rubber stamping the official 9/11 story then
>getting at the real truth.
>
>"Dr. Sherman was downwind from the Pentagon on 9/11 and her Geiger counter
>readings show an extremely high reading, a reading of more than eight to ten
>times higher than normal," said Moret, also an expert in the cause and
>effects of depleted uranium.
>
>"Dr. Sherman, who is well-respected radiation expert herself, then went
>about contacting the proper authorities in order to try and alert emergency
>responders of the radiation risk at the Pentagon crash site. And we have
>also kept photos of the Geiger counter readings in order to verify what Dr.
>Sherman found 12 miles away."
>
>After notifying the Nuclear Industrial Safety Agency (NIRS), experts from
>the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the FBI were alerted and
>according to Moret, radiation experts later confirmed high radiation levels
>at the Pentagon crash site possibly from the presence from depleted uranium
>or other unknown causes.
>
>But what disturbed Moret most has been the Bush administration's lack of
>concern and its failure to mount a thorough investigation into what really
>caused the high radiation levels, saying perhaps the findings might reveal
>something contrary to the official story that a jetliner rammed through 12
>Pentagon walls of solid concrete.
>
>"Even if there was depleted uranium used, do you think the likes of Bush,
>Cheney and Rumsfeld would really care? These are bottom feeders that 20 or
>30 years ago wouldn't have been even allowed to set foot in such high
>positions of power," said Moret.
>
>Although Dr. Sherman's Geiger counter can't be a conclusive finding, another
>nuclear radiation expert, Marion Fulk, agrees the positive reading, if
>anything, is suspicious.
>
>"It definitely looks suspicious but of course many factors have to be
>considered before a conclusion is reached," said Fulk in a telephone
>conversation this week. "The type of Geiger counter used by Dr. Sherman
>needs to be looked at as well as the possibility of the true source of the
>radiation, whether it is depleted uranium in a missile, ballast in the
>airplane or within the structure of the building hit."
>
>Even though no one can be sure, one thing positive is the Bush
>administration never really seriously cared about addressing the possibility
>of depleted uranium at the Pentagon just like it cares little about the same
>problem at the World Trade Center and in the war fields of Iraq and
>Afghanistan.
>
>And, more recently, Moret, Fulk and Maj. Rokke, along with Dennis Kyne, Bob
>Jones and Mark Zeller, have provided documentation for an explosive video
>written and produced by Joyce Riley and William Lewis called "Beyond
>Treason," providing an in depth look at depleted uranium used in the Gulf
>Wars and its likelihood of causing numerous civilian and military illnesses.
>
>"It has been determined that the equivalent of more than 400,000 Nagasaki
>bombs has been released in the middle east since 1991," said Moret, citing a
>report and subsequent speech at a 2000 depleted uranium conference given by
>Professor Yagasaki, a physicist and well-respected nuclear radiation expert.
>
>And in the 89 minute video, exploring a massive government cover up, Riley
>and Lewis point out the unexplained illnesses in civilians and military
>personal may be the cause of depleted uranium or perhaps a combination of
>overlapping causes, including chemical and biological exposure and the use
>of experimental vaccines.
>
>The writers of Beyond Treason, added:
>
>"The ailing Gulf War heroes from all 27 coalition countries slowly die from
>of "unknown causes," they wait for answers from their respective
>governments, but no satisfying or even credible answers have come forth from
>the military establishment. Records that span over a decade point to
>negligence and even culpability on the part of the U.S. Department of
>Defense and their disposable army" mentality.
>
>"The VA has determined that 250,000 troops are now permanently disabled,
>15,000 troops are dead and over 425,000 are ill and slowly dying from what
>the Department of Defense still calls a mystery disease. How many more will
>have to die before action is taken?"
>
>And in February, 2004, a conference called "Dialogues with Decision Makers"
>was held in New Delhi, India, where a group of experts gathered for the
>prevention of nuclear war and looked closely at the depleted uranium problem
>in the Middle East.
>
>Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat, former chief of the Naval Staff in India, reported
>the following shocking details about the effects of depleted uranium:
>
>"In the 2003 war, the Iraqi's were subjected to the Pentagon's radioactive
>arsenal, mainly in the urban centers, unlike in the deserts in 1991. The
>aggregate effects of illnesses and long term disabilities and genetic birth
>defects will be apparent only 2008 onwards. "By now, half of all the 697,000
>US soldiers involved in the 1991 war have reported serious illnesses.
>According the American Gulf War Veterans Association, more than 30% of these
>soldiers are chronically ill, and receiving disability benefits from the
>Veterans Administration.
>
>"Near the Republican Palace where US troops stood guard and over 1000
>employees walked in and out, the radiation readings were the hottest in
>Iraq, at nearly 1900 times background radiation levels.
>
>"At a roadside stand, selling fresh bunches of parsley, mint, and onions,
>children played on a burnt out Iraqi tank just outside Baghdad, the Geiger
>counter registered 1000 times normal background radiation.
>
>"The Pentagon and the United Nations estimate that the US and Britain used
>1,100 to 2,200 tons of armor piercing shells made of DU during attacks in
>March-April 2003, far more than the 1991 Gulf War (this does not include air
>dispensed DU munitions and missiles)," wrote the Post Intelligencer.
>
>"The long term effects, as Dr Asaf Durakovic elaborates, after the early
>neurological symptoms are cancer, and related radiation illnesses such as
>chronic fatigue syndrome, joint and muscle pain, neurological and/or nerve
>damage, mood disturbances, auto-immune deficiencies, lung and kidney damage,
>vision problems, skin rupture, increase in miscarriages, maternal mortality
>and genetic birth defects/deformation.
>
>"For years the US government described the Gulf War Syndrome as a post
>traumatic stress disorder. It was labeled as a psychological problem or
>simply as mysterious unrelated ailments much in the same way as health
>problems of Vietnam veterans suffering from Agent Orange poisoning."
>
>
>For more informative articles, go to www.arcticbeacon.com. Greg Szymanski
>Powered by CityMak
>
>http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/31824.htm
>
>"It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any
>technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every
>place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic
>knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and
>the MISSILE to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the
>World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the
>battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them."
>
>Donald Rumsfeld answering Parade Magazine reporter Lyric Wallwork Winik in
>Pentagon Press Conference Oct.12, 2001. (Posted on the Pentagon website)
>
>http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/rumsfeld-warnings.htm
>

.

Relevant Pages