Re: Every morning when I wake up the first thought that goes through my mind is: I KNOW WHO THE ANTHRAX TERRORIST IS AND THE FBI DON'T

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:41:12 -0400, Horatio Fudruckerton <HF@xxxxxxx>
wrote:





The first thing that goes through your mind in the morning should
be a .44 caliber projectile.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

You hate America.






















On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "I, Enemy Combatant"
<bongblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



There can only be one reason why the FBI would *protect* the Jewish
anthrax terrorist and blame/frame it on a Christian liberal peacenik.

Newbies may ask: "How did JEWS take over and start running things at
the Federal Bureau of Investigation?

As you can see, this article is somewhat dated, but it answers the
question:

How did JEWS take over and start running things at the FBI?

Free Speech - August 2002 - Volume VIII, Number VIII
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mossad and the Jewish Problem
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs0208b.html
by Dr. William Pierce

For several years, I have been warning in these broadcasts about the
growing infiltration and subversion of American law-enforcement
agencies by Jewish pressure groups. This process, which has been going
on at a significant rate for more than two decades, accelerated during
the Clinton administration, especially after the Oklahoma City bombing
in 1995, when Jewish groups put themselves forward as "experts on
terrorism," based on their experience in repressing Palestinians and
on their undercover snooping into dissident groups in the United
States. They offered training seminars to the FBI and other Federal
police agencies, to various military units, and to state and local
police agencies.

"We will show you how to recognize terrorists and potential terrorists
and how to deal with them. We will tell you about these dangerous
dissident organizations, these 'hate' groups, and we will help you to
prevent another terrorist bombing, such as the one carried out by
Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma City," the Jewish groups told the police
and military agencies. The most visible of these groups was the Anti-
Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, but as we will see, there also were
other, less visible Jewish groups at work.

Never mind that Timothy McVeigh had not belonged to any dissident
group but had acted solely as an angry individual determined to send
the government a message that its behavior in massacring the members
of the Branch Davidian church in Waco, Texas, would not be tolerated.
Never mind that the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish groups
offering their services really were pushing the military and law-
enforcement agencies to shift their emphasis toward the investigation
and repression of dissidents and the enforcement of a brand-new
category of laws -- so-called "hate crime" and "speech crime" laws --
rather than toward the prevention of terrorism.

Never mind those things; it was the Clinton era, and Bill Clinton had
brought more Jews into the government than any previous President.
Jews were riding high in the Clinton administration, from Monica
Lewinsky to Madaleine Albright. When the Jews wanted something, the
Jews got it, and smart bureaucrats, including those in the military
and law-enforcement agencies, knew better than to ask questions.

Bill Clinton's extraordinary partiality to Jews lasted right up to the
moment he left office, with a vastly disproportionate number of the
last-minute pardons and commutations of sentences that he issued on
January 20 last year going to Jewish criminals. The most notorious of
these was the international Jewish super-swindler Marc Rich, who was
able to persuade the head Jew in the Anti-Defamation League, Abe
Foxman, to intercede with Clinton on his behalf.

All of this partiality has served Mr. Clinton well. In his first year
after leaving office, he received $9.2 million in speaking fees, most
of it from Jewish organizations. He received $400,000 last year from
one Jewish organization alone, the Jewish National Fund, for three
speeches. More than nine million dollars for some 70 speeches during
the course of a year. Fascinating, isn't it? You can find more
information on Mr. Clinton's career as a speaker to Jewish groups for
huge fees in the June 18 issue of the New York Times, if you look
carefully enough.

Well, that was Bill Clinton, a Democrat and a flamboyantly crooked
lawyer from Arkansas who appealed to the lowest elements in the
electorate and had a love affair with the Jewish mass media. Most
voters hoped for more from George Bush and the Republicans.
Unfortunately, what we've gotten is more of the same. In fact, Jewish
infiltration and subversion of our military and law-enforcement
agencies has proceeded even faster since Mr. Bush took office. Bush
certainly doesn't need the money from speaking fees, but he
nevertheless has given virtual run of the government to Jews. Under
Mr. Bush as under Mr. Clinton, what the Jews want the Jews get, and no
one in the government has the courage or the integrity to challenge
this situation.

We talked last week about the FBI turning loose 200 Israeli espionage
agents that it arrested in the United States last year and about its
refusal to arrest the anthrax terrorist, who killed five people and
terrorized the whole country with his mailings of anthrax-infected
letters. In the anthrax case, the FBI still is putting on a big show
of trying to find the perpetrator. FBI spokesmen claim that more
personnel and resources are allocated to catching the anthrax
terrorist than to any other case except the 9/11 attack itself. I
claim that this is all a fraud: that the FBI knows who the perpetrator
is but has orders not to arrest him, because he is a Jew who carried
out the anthrax mailings in an attempt to cast suspicion on Muslims
and to generate public hostility against Israel's enemies. If this
became public knowledge, there would be a substantial drop in support
among ordinary Americans for Israel and for Mr. Bush's current war in
the Middle East.

The big question is, why would the FBI go along with such a coverup?
Even with orders directly from Attorney General John Ashcroft or from
George Bush himself, any FBI official who went along with the coverup
would be taking a huge risk. Why do that for the sake of Israel? Who
would protect the FBI people involved if the coverup got blown? The
"partnership" between the Anti-Defamation League and the FBI that both
ADL National Director Abe Foxman and FBI Director Robert Mueller have
been bragging about doesn't seem enough to account for such a flagrant
dereliction of duty on the part of the FBI. Surely, someone in the FBI
would blow the whistle.

Actually, someone has blown the whistle, but you'd hardly know it from
reading the news. Of course, there's been much coverage of one recent
FBI whistle-blower, Coleen Rowley, a special agent in the FBI's
Minneapolis field office, in connection with FBI officials ignoring
reports she sent to Washington headquarters last August -- that was
before the September 11 attack -- about a suspected terrorist,
Zacarias Moussaoui, who was attempting to learn to fly 747 jets. But
there's been very little coverage of another FBI whistle-blower, Sibel
Edmonds, and the coverage of her far more alarming revelations has
been quite cryptic, to say the least.

There was a story in the Washington Post ten days ago, on June 19,
about several FBI whistle-blowers, one of whom was Sibel Edmonds, who
worked as a translator of wiretapped messages in the FBI's Washington,
DC, office. Despite her name, Edmonds is, in fact, a Jewess. But she
is a rare Jewess, without a very strong sense of loyalty to her tribe.
Indeed, an alarmingly high percentage of the FBI's wiretap translators
are Jews, and nearly all of them who translate Middle Eastern
languages are Jews. Most of these have a much stronger sense of their
Jewishness than does Edmonds, as Edmonds found out when they tried to
recruit her into the Mossad, Israel's super-secret agency for
espionage, terror, and assassination.

The Washington Post story relates her account of the recruitment
attempts in cryptic language that clearly is intended to avoid
mentioning the words "Jew," "Israel," or "Mossad," lest our gallant,
little democratic ally in the Middle East or its partisans in this
country be cast in a bad light. I'll now read to you the relevant
portions of that June 19 story in the Washington Post:


That whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, 32, a former wiretap translator in
the Washington field office, raised suspicions about a co-worker's
connections to a group under surveillance. Under pressure, FBI
officials have investigated and verified the veracity of parts of
Edmonds' story, according to documents and people familiar with an FBI
briefing of congressional staff.... The FBI confirmed that Edmonds' co-
worker had been part of an organization that was a target of top-
secret surveillance and that the same co-worker had "unreported
contacts" with a foreign government official subject to the
surveillance....
The FBI said it was unable to corroborate an allegation by Edmonds
that she was approached to join the targeted group. Edmonds said she
told Dennis Saccher, a special agent in the Washington field office
who was conducting the surveillance, about the co-worker's actions and
Saccher replied, "It looks like espionage to me." Saccher declined to
comment when contacted by a reporter.

Edmonds was fired in March after she reported her concerns. Government
officials said the FBI fired her because her "disruptiveness" hurt her
on-the-job "performance." Edmonds says she believes she was fired in
retaliation for reporting on her co-worker.

Edmonds began working at the FBI in late September [of last year]. In
an interview she said she became particularly alarmed when she
discovered that a recently hired FBI translator was saying that she
belonged to the Middle Eastern organization whose taped conversations
she had been translating for FBI counterintelligence agents. Officials
asked that the name of the target group not be revealed for national
security reasons....

Edmonds said that on several occasions the translator tried to recruit
her to join the targeted foreign group. "This person told us she
worked for our target organization," Edmonds said in an interview.
"These are the people we are targeting, monitoring."

Edmonds would not identify the other translator, but the Post has
learned from other sources that she is a 33-year-old U.S. citizen
whose native country is home to the target group. Both Edmonds and the
other translator are U.S. citizens who trace their ethnicity to the
same Middle Eastern country. Reached by telephone last week, the
woman, who works under contract for the FBI's Washington field office,
declined to comment.

In December, Edmonds said the woman and her husband, a U.S. military
officer, suggested during a hastily arranged visit to Edmonds'
Northern Virginia home on a Sunday morning that Edmonds join the
group. 'Are you a member of the particular organization?,' Edmonds
recalled the woman's husband saying. 'It's a very good place to be a
member. There are a lot of advantages of being with this organization
and doing things together' -- this is our targeted organization --
'and one of the greatest things about it is you can have an early, an
unexpected, early retirement. And you will be totally set if you go to
that specific country.'

Edmonds also said the woman's husband told her she would be admitted
to the group, especially if she said she worked for the FBI. Later,
Edmonds said, the woman approached her with a list dividing up
individuals whose phone lines were being secretly tapped: Under the
plan the woman would translate conversations of her former co-workers
in the target organization, and Edmonds would handle other phone
calls. Edmonds said she refused and that the woman told her that her
lack of cooperation could put her family in danger.

Edmonds said she also brought her concerns to her supervisor and other
FBI officials in the Washington field office. When no action was
taken, she said, she reported her concerns to the FBI's Office of
Professional Responsibility, then to Justice's inspector general.

"Investigations are being compromised," Edmonds wrote to the inspector
general's office in March. "Incorrect or misleading translations are
being sent to agents in the field. Translations are being blocked and
circumvented."

Government officials familiar with the matter who asked not to be
identified said that both Edmonds and the woman were given polygraph
examinations by the FBI and that both passed.

I'm sorry that the cryptic language made that report more difficult to
understand than it otherwise would have been: a certain unnamed
"Middle Eastern country," an unnamed co-worker of Sibel Edmonds who is
a native of that unnamed Middle Eastern country, an unnamed "target
organization" in that unnamed Middle Eastern country, and so on. The
Washington Post tells us that the cryptic language is necessary "for
national security reasons." That's certainly a phony excuse. Do you
really believe that the folks in the Israeli Embassy reading this
article can't figure out who is being talked about? The real reason
for not mentioning names is not to keep the Mossad from finding out
that they're being investigated; it's to keep any Sally Soccermoms or
Joe Sixpacks who might stumble across the story on their way to the
comic strips or the sports pages from getting a clue as to who's
really calling the shots at the FBI these days.

Let me just run over the scenario again. After the Oklahoma City
bombing, during a time when the FBI was being criticized for letting
the bombing happen, Jewish groups promoted themselves as "experts" on
terrorism and offered to train FBI agents and other law-enforcement
and military personnel. One of these Jewish groups was the Anti-
Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, a group heavily involved in illegal
activity and with longstanding ties to Jewish organized crime figures,
such as international super-swindler Marc Rich and Las Vegas gangster
Moe Dalitz. Another of these Jewish groups was Israel's espionage and
terror organization, Mossad, which specializes in the assassination of
Israel's enemies in other countries, using letter bombs, car bombs,
exotic poisons, and trained hit-men armed with silencer-equipped
submachine guns.

The impropriety of FBI involvement with either of these Jewish
organizations should have been obvious, but in the Clinton era, no
bureaucrat in Washington dared say anything critical of Jews or
Israel. George Bush has a different style, but no more scruples than
Bill Clinton. By the time he became President, the corruption had
proceeded so far that it was easy for him to decide to join it instead
of trying to lick it. And early in his administration another major
terrorist event -- that of September 11 -- gave Jewish groups another
rationale for strengthening their "partnership" with U.S. law-
enforcement agencies. With Anti-Defamation League agents working on
the outside and redefining the types of criminal activity with which
the FBI should concern itself, and Mossad agents working inside and
preempting for themselves all investigations of interest to Israel,
including all investigations of Israeli espionage, it is no wonder
that the FBI's efficiency, morale, and prestige have plummeted, and
things that would have been unthinkable a decade ago -- such as
refusing to prosecute the members of the largest espionage ring ever
broken up in the United States and engaging in an internal coverup of
the anthrax terrorism case -- could occur.

This is a depressing situation -- and as I have warned repeatedly, an
extremely dangerous situation. We are in grave danger of losing all of
our remaining liberty and soon thereafter becoming extinct as a
people, as a race. There certainly is no hope at all of rectifying
this situation from the top, through the elected politicians and the
top bureaucrats. Did you hear George Bush make his pronouncement on
Monday about the conflict between the Jews and the Palestinians?
Yasser Arafat, the elected leader of the Palestinians, must go because
he has been "tainted by terrorism." Anyone who, like Arafat, has
condoned terrorism is unacceptable as a negotiating partner for the
Israelis and must be replaced by someone who has clean hands. Really!
I can imagine all of the Jewish leaders, including that "man of
peace," as Bush calls him, Ariel Sharon, rolling on the floor with
laughter during Bush's statement. I would not be surprised if it were
Sharon himself, the Butcher of Beirut, the mass murderer of
Palestinian women and children, the preeminent terrorist and war
criminal in the Middle East, who wrote that statement for Bush.

George Bush is a man utterly without honor, without principles,
without a shred of genuine patriotism or racial loyalty. As long as
the Jewish media continue to give him good press, he is perfectly
content to be Ariel Sharon's step'n'fetchit and to say and do whatever
he is told to say and do. Underneath Bush is Attorney General John
Ashcroft, a nutcase religious fanatic whose historical role model is
Tomas de Torquemada and who believes that the Jews can do no wrong
because that's what it says in the Bible. And then there is FBI
Director Robert Mueller, a pitiful specimen of an unprincipled career
bureaucrat indeed, a man who is completely unperturbed by the ongoing
Jewish subversion and takeover of the FBI.

Our one basis for hope is the fact that the takeover is not yet
complete. If it were complete, there would be no debate, no
investigation by some FBI agents of the Mossad, no newspaper articles
with cryptic language like the one I read to you from the Washington
Post. The fact is there are many FBI special agents who are not happy
about what is being done to the FBI. And there are hundreds of
thousands of perceptive and intelligent White Americans who also are
not happy. Unfortunately, very few of these people have the courage to
do or even say anything about what is happening.

And there is one other factor besides a lack of courage, although it
is a related factor, and that is the inability to address our problem
in a truly fundamental way, a truly radical way. There are many
patriotic Americans who would be alarmed to learn that a foreign
espionage organization, the Mossad, has infiltrated the FBI and is
able to subvert the FBI's operations, but there are fewer patriotic
Americans willing and able to draw the necessary conclusions about the
overall role of Jews in America. They see the problem as simply a
problem with the Mossad. They resist tying the Mossad problem to the
Anti-Defamation League problem and to the problem of Jewish influence
in the government generally. They resist seeing the connection between
the problem of Jewish influence in the government and Jewish influence
in the mass media of news and entertainment.

They resist seeing these things because to see them, to examine them,
to think about them and draw conclusions from them, is to become anti-
Jewish, anti-Semitic. And they have been so strongly conditioned
against that for so long that they simply can't deal with it. Many who
are brave enough and honest enough to speak out about a Mossad problem
cannot even think about the much larger Jewish problem of which the
Mossad problem is only a relatively small part. And as long as we
refuse to think about the problem, as long as we are afraid to think
about it, we cannot hope to solve it.

And really, we'd better begin thinking about this problem very soon.
Time is running out for America and for our people.

© 2002 National Vanguard Books · Box 330 · Hillsboro ·WV 24946 · USA
.

Loading