Re: Umm, still think OBAMA is a "liberal"? "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat."

On Jun 30, 8:57 am, Mark Nobles <cmn-nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bert Hyman <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
po...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx () wrote in
news:78baaf6f-3242-4554-accc-67823eec8123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:


And anyone who doesn't see this should read up on how he financed his
house in Chicago.

I hope you are not suggesting that he sells his house in Chicago? I
hope not. I wouldn't do that to anybody. What if he doesn't win?
After all, I didn't demand *** Cheney to sell his stocks (which
profitted quite handsomely because of his policy) before assuming the
reign of this country. The public didn't ask for it. And I wouldn't
do so to Obama.

More importantly though, I would want to know what Obama's stand is on
Iran, as of now. I mean, Obama wasn't in any power to change the
policy this country was heading towards the Invasion of Iraq back
then. But not now, as a front runner of the Democratic ticket, I
think the American people have every right to know what Obama would do
now, given the circumstance; what if he were at the White House at
this very moment, would he have attacked Iran? That's a fair
question, right?

I just hope that he can provide a sincere and honest answer to the
above question. Since he's touting "superior judgment" as his strong
point, I think we would like to know. This is just to know him better
as a person. The past is so the past. The past may give a
predictable indication of what a person may do in the FUTURE. Now, I
would want to hear what he would like to do. Let's have a fresh start
from this "breath of fresh air." That's how I would tend to see
others anyway, I don't care whether a person is black or gay or from
whichever group I don't feel as part of their "group." I see people
by how they react to the situation and their circumstance. It is
almost as I turn off the light and suddenly a person's superficial
association and appearance would make no difference. Yup, that's how
I "see" others, by turning off the light, by suspending my judgment.
Let's have a fresh start.

A candidate has to be candid on something so important. Amen.


"What would he have done now, if he were in power?" Attack or no
attack?

For the love of this country...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rpc-I6U6oo




This weekend, the talking heads were praising him for being more
"pragmatic", by abandoning his old positions and adopting any new ones
that might get him elected.

They seemed to think that calling someone a pragmatist was some sort
of compliment; it simply means they have no principles.

John Chapter 21, verses 12-18:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%2021:12-18&version=31

"I tell you the truth, when you were younger you dressed yourself and
went where you wanted."

Now, I want to know where you want to lead this nation, Mr. Obama.
Please go within your HEART and give us your answer. Thank you.


God First, Country Second, Party last


*** The Nine Seconds fall-time unravels the WHOLE mystery behind
9/11.


**Have you forgotten that invading Iraq has nothing to do with the
culprits who perpetuated 9/11?


"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with
September 11." --George W. Bush, 9-17-2003, 182 days after the
Invasion of Iraq began
=======================================================
ADS


"I mean [pause]... afterall [semi-pause], this (Saddam) is a guy that
tried to kill my dad." George W. Bush, 9-26-2002, in a fund raising
function for GOP Senate Hopeful John Cornyn in Houston, 380 days
after the tragedy of 911 where he revealed his true intention


.

Quantcast