Re: Why not Hillary?

On Jan 31, 10:48 am, Horatio Fudruckerton <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:08:23 -0800 (PST), Zigler



<misterzig...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Simple.

Divisive, arrogant bitch who apparently ripped a few pages out of the
Karl Rove play book to share with her husband in the current campaign.

Well, whoever hasn't had enough of this fucking *** deserves the
"leaders" they have gotten, but the rest of us do not.

Some say the time for Obama has not yet come, and maybe so, but the
time for Hillary has already come and gone. Why the hell didn't she
become the Democratic nominee instead of John "Lurch" Kerry is a good
question. She may have made a much better "anyone but Bush" candidate
then.

But now the last thing America needs is ANY continuance of the
bull*** status quo and juvenile, Neanderthal divisiveness that only
benefits idiots like Rush Limbaugh and the corporate media and no one
else.

As for "who is ready to start on day one", we need to ask "start what,
and in what way?", and also recall that Disaster Bush was very
"experienced" and "ready to start on day one".

Flame away.

Why flame an idiot; they are too stupid to realize they are
being flamed.

Only you would know, degenerate "porch ***"-hating piece of racist
***!







.

Quantcast