Hillary's network of sycophants
- From: jose <josefsoplar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Hillary's network of sycophants
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 11, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Mychal Massie
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) 2007
In support of presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, former mayor of
Atlanta, Ga., and former Ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young
asserted that the other Democrat presidential hopeful, Barack Hussein
Obama, is "too young and lacks the support network" to be president.
Young went on to say that "Hillary has her husband behind her" and
that "Bill [Clinton] is [not only] every bit as black as [Obama]," but
that "[Bill] has probably gone with more black women than [Obama]" -
adding after which, "I'm clowning" [about Clinton's dating black women
remark].
Young's claim that Clinton is as black as Obama, which parallels
Clinton being called America's first black president, is fallacious.
Young was on the frontlines of the civil rights battles - he of all
people should understand that Clinton's morally opprobrious failings
were exactly those that were attributed to black men during Jim Crow -
usually just before or immediately after they were lynched.
Ergo, to herald Clinton as a "brother" is tantamount to ascribing a
lecherousness commonality on black men that should be taken as the
deepest and most personal of insults.
Pursuant to his comments of Obama lacking "the support network" to be
president, Young might have a point. Obama obviously doesn't have the
availability of the financial experts responsible for tutoring Hillary
on how to beat the 1-in-250 million odds it took to turn $1,000 in
cattle futures into a $100,000 windfall. Point made, Mr. Young.
(Column continues below)
It is also doubtful that Obama has the "network," should his wife
descend to the level of morality Hillary's husband is said to have
with women, to remain a public figure - much less continue his quest
for the presidency. Nor does Obama have the "network" to appoint a Web
Hubbell to head a state ethics commission specifically to weaken
ethics legislation, thus exempting Clinton from the rigorous
provisions of same.
It is certainly factual to allow that there remains no "network of
support" sufficient to keep the piranhas from exhaustively
investigating Obama should three persons connected with him suddenly,
violently and questionably die, much less if it were upwards of 30
persons, as is the case with the Clintons.
And while Obama does have his own problems pursuant to shady land
deals, his pale in comparison to the 15-count indictment that alleged
Web Hubbell covered up the Rose Law Firm's involvement in a
multimillion-dollar (some would say) fraudulent land deal, which led
to the bankruptcy of Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan. With Hillary's
legal work referenced throughout the indictment, she has not
officially been accused of wrongdoing - proving once again her
"network" is bigger than Obama's.
If Obama were repeatedly accused of making anti-Semitic slurs, his
media "network" would not be sufficient to keep him off the front
pages of every newspaper known to man. But in the face of such
allegations by highly credible sources, for Hillary it is a non-
problem.
The fact that Hillary served six years on the board of Wal-Mart means
little to the unions that support her. Could Obama's network have him
avoid the ad hominem vitriol of being involved with the avowed enemy
of unions?
Hillary's involvement with Johnny Chung, Norman Hsu, the Chinese, the
Lincoln Bedroom campaign shakedowns and countless other scandals is
winked at by the mainstream media. Campaign contributions linked to
drug dealers, frauds and extortionists are non-news, as are her over-
the-top lies, including the one in which she claimed daughter Chelsea
was jogging around the World Trade Towers the morning they were
attacked.
Obama may have Oprah, but Oprah would drop her support for him quicker
than you could say Prada or Cartier if he were to behave as the
Clintons. But the Clinton sycophants are not only willing to serve
prison sentences for them - they are willing to fall on their swords
for her at a moments notice.
I agree with Young that Clinton has the 'bigger network." I disagree
that is the reason Obama shouldn't be president. He should not be
elected president because he isn't fit to sit in the Oval Office.
Hillary shouldn't be president because she is bereft of morality and
because of her inexorable commitment to falsehood.
The fact that she and her "black" husband have had to ante up one of
the largest collections of affidavits and letters attesting to their
legal innocence (not their moral innocence) in the history of modern
politics - in this essayist's purview - gives credence to the adages
"where there is smoke there is fire" and "you cannot have lots of cow
manure without lots of cows" - or in Hillary's case, one big one.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Skeptical Scientists Urge World To 'Have the Courage to Do Nothing' At UN Conference
- Next by Date: Re: Skeptical Scientists Urge World To 'Have the Courage to Do Nothing' At UN Conference
- Previous by thread: Skeptical Scientists Urge World To 'Have the Courage to Do Nothing' At UN Conference
- Next by thread: Are Stocks Fixed in US ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
