Re: Dems as weak tea....

Honestly,I really think those Democrats are extremely STUPID.
Even over her,look at how Liberals argue over serious issues.




"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:X9R2j.14951$r81.4293@xxxxxxxxxxx

You'll notice the liberal NY Times commentators are now attacking the
Dems. They simply don't believe the Dems are offering anything special to
the electorate. Indeed, they think that Dems are gutless, given their
unwillingness to oppose Bush.

The Times and her writers don't understand, however, that Dems are not
only gutless, they are unprincipled. They claimed they would enact all of
the 9/11 Report's recommendations. They did not. They claimed they would
reform earmarks.They did not. They even claimed they would work to bring
the soldiers home from Iraq. They have not. All these claims were simply
things they said to get elected. Once there, they decided all these things
weren't worth doing if it meant possibly losing their power.

The latest take on this theme is from Bob Herbert about the Dem candidates
for president:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/opinion/27herbert.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

Did any of you leftists see Hillary squirm about drivers' licenses for
illegals? And then did you see Obama pounce on the issue like a cat with a
ball of yarn? And then did you see Obama falter when he himself was asked
about drivers' licenses for illegals?

Have any of you heard John Edwards go on and on and on and on about
"corporate lobbyists" being the most evil thing since Satan, only to
embarrass himself about taking money from trial lawyers? His response was
"None of us is perfect." Hey, Edwards, how about "All of us are
hypocrites"?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dems as weak tea....
    ... Even over her,look at how Liberals argue over serious issues. ... They simply don't believe the Dems are offering anything special to ... And then did you see Obama pounce on the issue like a cat with ... Have any of you heard John Edwards go on and on and on and on about ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Dems as weak tea....
    ... You'll notice the liberal NY Times commentators are now attacking the Dems. ... They simply don't believe the Dems are offering anything special to the electorate. ... And then did you see Obama pounce on the issue like a cat with a ball of yarn? ... Have any of you heard John Edwards go on and on and on and on about "corporate lobbyists" being the most evil thing since Satan, only to embarrass himself about taking money from trial lawyers? ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: "If people want the status quo, Senator Clintons your candidate."
    ... That's John Edwards at last night's debate. ... A rather mild criticism, as ... that the Dems would lose in the election if she gets the nomination. ... candidates in the field, but I do have a preference. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • "If people want the status quo, Senator Clintons your candidate."
    ... That's John Edwards at last night's debate. ... A rather mild criticism, as Edwards tries to claw his way from third place. ... He pointed out that 50% of the electorate say they will not vote for Clinton. ... But, like 2004, the Dems will choose the safest candidate and put Clinton up against the Repubs. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Dems as weak tea....
    ... They simply don't believe the Dems are offering anything special to ... And then did you see Obama pounce on the issue like a cat with a ... about drivers' licenses for illegals? ... Have any of you heard John Edwards go on and on and on and on about ...
    (alt.politics.bush)