Re: Liberal NYt Admits Bush's No Child Left behind Success

"Criminal Democrap Congressman Jefferson Indicted"
<http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/04/politics/main2882231.shtml>
wrote in message news:466865f9$0$28237$a82e2bb9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"bushhelpscorporationsdestroyamerica"
<bushhelpscorporations@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1181240169.706547.93820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 7, 9:04 am, "Criminal Democrap Congressman Jefferson Indicted"
<http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/04/politics/main2882231.shtml>
wrote:
So of course they bury the story on page 30 because it is such a
great Bush
success.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/06/education/06report.html?_r=2&oref=s...

June 6, 2007

New Study Finds Gains Since No Child Left Behind
By SAM DILLON

Student achievement has increased and test score gaps between white
students
and black and Hispanic students have narrowed in many states since
President
Bush signed the No Child Left Behind law in 2002, according to a new
survey
of state scores in reading and math.

But the study, released yesterday by the Center on Education Policy,
an
independent Washington group that closely monitors the law,
cautioned that
"it is difficult if not impossible to determine the extent to which
these
trends in test results have occurred because of N.C.L.B."

"In most states with three or more years of comparable test data,
student
achievement in reading and math has gone up since 2002," the study
found,
even as it warned repeatedly against concluding that the federal law
alone
produced the results.

In the decade before the law was passed, many states had adopted
policies
aimed at raising achievement, like broadening access to early
childhood
programs, that could also be responsible for gains.

The study also acknowledged that the increases in achievement
recorded by
many state tests had not been matched by results of the National
Assessment
of Educational Progress, nationwide reading and math tests
administered by
the federal Department of Education.

Those results have been mixed. For example, on the national tests
given in
2005, fourth-grade math scores showed an important increase over the
previous test administration in 2003, and eighth-grade math scores
rose
slightly. But fourth-grade reading scores were the same on the
nationwide
test in 2005 as in 2002, and eighth-grade reading scores declined.

Despite its caveats, the new report is likely to be closely studied
as
Congress debates whether to reauthorize the law this year, partly
because
the report may be the most comprehensive study of state test scores
in many
years. The law is widely considered President Bush's most important
domestic
policy achievement.

"This study confirms that No Child Left Behind has struck a chord of
success
with our nation's schools and students," Education Secretary
Margaret
Spellings said yesterday.

Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, who worked
closely
with the administration on the law, said the report "proves that the
goals
at the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act - a dedication to
accountability and standards, a commitment to closing the
achievement gap
and a pledge to improve public schools - are still the right ones
for moving
America forward."

Merely collecting the test data from 50 states proved to be a
complex and
frustrating task because many states' education departments are
overworked
and their test archives are flawed by missing or inconsistent data,
the
report said. "The house of data on which N.C.L.B. is built is at
times a
rickety structure," it said.

Those and other limitations notwithstanding, Jack Jennings, the
center's
president, said state test scores "remain a more accurate barometer
of what
kids know" than the national assessment, often referred to as the
NAEP
(pronounced nape).

"The NAEP shouldn't be taken as the gold standard," Mr. Jennings
said.

Bruce Fuller, an education professor at the University of California
at
Berkeley who has compared state and federal achievement scores, said
the
report "displays methodological weaknesses which lead to exaggerated
inferences" about student progress.

In analyzing state scores, the researchers who carried out the study
did not
consider all recent data from all states because, the report said,
new tests
and other factors in some states made it impossible to compare
scores from
one year with others. But Professor Fuller said the researchers
appeared to
have eliminated testing periods in some states that showed
predominantly
falling scores after 2002.

"It's like calculating the annual rate of economic growth over the
past
century after excluding the Great Depression years," Professor
Fuller said.
"It upwardly biases their estimate of annual growth in test scores."

Robert L. Linn, an education professor emeritus at the University of
Colorado at Boulder and a frequent critic of the law, served on a
panel of
five prominent testing and educational policy experts who advised
the center
on the study.

"I was a little surprised that things were generally as positive as
they
were, so it may be that I would say that N.C.L.B. is contributing
more
positively than I had given it credit for," Professor Linn said. But
he
urged readers to pay attention to the report's many caveats.

"The reason for all the caveats is that it is impossible to reach
the
conclusion that if scores go up, it is because of N.C.L.B.," he
said. "There
are so many other factors that could lead to rising scores,
including state
efforts to raise achievement, and also, some of these gains may be
artificial. So my worry is that people who come at it and don't read
the
caveats will come away with an exaggerated impression."

Laura S. Hamilton, a senior behavioral scientist for the Rand
Corporation
who also served on the panel of experts, said, "Most people want to
know if
N.C.L.B. as a policy has resulted in improved student achievement,"
but
added, "It's a question that isn't answerable." She explained, "To
test
whether some policy is effective, you'd want to compare what
happened under
that policy to what would have happened if the policy hadn't been
enacted,
and we can't do that with N.C.L.B. because all public schools in the
nation
were subject to its provisions."

no child left behind is a failure
==================

If it was a failure, the HYT would have had it on page 1 In BOLD
type.

WTF is the "HYT", you illiterate retard?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Liberal NYt Admits Bushs No Child Left behind Success
    ... Student achievement has increased and test score gaps between white students ... Bush signed the No Child Left Behind law in 2002, ... the federal Department of Education. ... policy achievement. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Liberal NYt Admits Bushs No Child Left behind Success
    ... New Study Finds Gains Since No Child Left Behind ... Bush signed the No Child Left Behind law in 2002, ... the federal Department of Education. ... policy achievement. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Liberal NYt Admits Bushs No Child Left behind Success
    ... New Study Finds Gains Since No Child Left Behind ... Bush signed the No Child Left Behind law in 2002, ... the federal Department of Education. ... policy achievement. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Liberal NYt Admits Bushs No Child Left behind Success
    ... New Study Finds Gains Since No Child Left Behind ... Bush signed the No Child Left Behind law in 2002, ... "In most states with three or more years of comparable test data, student ... the federal Department of Education. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • The French Revolution - again!
    ... vowed to intensify their protests yesterday, ... union and student leaders stayed firm ... that the First Employment Contract (CPE) was ... and sign his government's youth job law - a ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
Loading