Re: Donkey party -- worse than we thought

On May 4, 11:43 am, eeld...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 4, 12:37 pm, ottodachat <www.youtube.com/timsmithfilmfestival>
wrote:





Trey Harlow wrote:
As the repug party sinks further into insignificance, these kind of
desperate attacks will only increase. Desperation breeds stupidity.

also notice how he takes on an alarmist tone. Like all this is going to
happen and "you better watch out!" Why is it that conservatives can't
see that under Bush more Americans have fallen into poverty since he
took office. Also Iraq is a lost cause. The soldiers are in the middle
of a civil war and there is no way they can stop it unless we pull out
and nuke the crap out of them!

"jose" <josefsop...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1178295097.827892.36530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This guy is being kind. The Dems are all jackasses.

Donkey party -- worse than we thought
DOUG PATTON

Earlier this year, I wrote that congressional Democrats would
disappoint their liberal base because "holding power means
compromise." I was wrong. Democrats are doing their level best to
please their radical leftist constituencies, and it's worse than we
thought. In their first 100 days in control of Congress, they have
introduced legislation that would cripple small business, surrender in
Iraq, socialize our medical care and extend the redundant hypocrisy of
hate crimes to gays.

The Dems recently passed the Employee Free Choice Act through the
House. This Communist-inspired legislation (no kidding...the Communist
Party USA has proudly endorsed it) removes a worker's right to a
secret ballot when deciding whether or not to join a union. Unions
could invade workplaces with a "card-check" system that lets them
organize if a majority of workers sign up.

Imagine a burly Teamster showing up at your home on a Saturday
morning, pressuring you to vote in favor of the union. A small
business owner with three employees could be forcibly unionized if two
of those employees sign the card. Employees who don't want to work in
a union environment would lose their right to vote on this issue.

If you think having unions infest America's 22 million small
businesses, demanding absurd wages and outrageous pensions, is a good
idea, ask General Motors. After being systematically eviscerated by
the United Auto Workers for the last 50 years, GM has now fallen
behind Toyota as the world's number one maker of automobiles.
From there we move on to the condescending protection of "minorities"
in the form of superfluous hate crimes legislation. The latest attempt
has been named the Matthew Shepard Act, in honor of a Wyoming meth
addict killed in a drug deal gone bad. The fact that he happened to be
gay apparently entitled him to more protection than your average
straight meth addict.

Do we really believe that a murderer is going to pause in the
commission of his crime and say, "Wait, you're not gay, are you?" What
if the killer himself comes out of the closet while on trial? Is it no
longer a hate crime? And what are the ramifications for a preacher who
dares to tell his congregation what the Bible says about
homosexuality? Suppose the next day a homosexual is beaten up in that
community? Is that preacher's sermon now "hate speech?"

Then there is the issue the Dems think is their ticket back to the
Oval Office: THE WAR. The "This Is Hard So Let's Give Up" bill has
been vetoed. This legislation was passed so Dems can go back to their
districts next year and say, "We tried to bring the boys home, but
Bush wanted them to stay and get killed." One of the few Democrats I
know of who has consistently hoped for our troops to fail is Dennis
Kucinich. The fact that Dennis Kucinich is now a Democratic
trendsetter may just be the saddest thing ever.

And, of course, there is the constant Democrat drumbeat to return to
the tired old concept of universal health care. This idea will not
die, despite the utter failure of such programs in Europe, Canada and
elsewhere.

Several other pieces of legislation are in the works. One is an
elaboration of the original 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA),
which would cost businesses millions and give even more paid leave to
new parents. How on earth did we, as Americans, ever manage to have
both kids and jobs before 1993? The average family today has fewer
children and more disposable income than any previous generation, and
yet we need even more time off than they did?

Democrats are singing the same socialist tune they have since FDR
declared himself Nanny-in-Chief. It goes something like this
(especially since the 60s): "You cannot take care of yourself. You
deserve more than others. Rich people owe you. Armed conflict is never
the answer, especially when it takes longer than a month. You deserve
free medical coverage. If you are gay, non-white, female,
transgendered or whatever, you need even more protection." Here's the
reality: we are Americans. Let's start acting more like adults and
less like Democrats.

Doug Patton is a freelance columnist who has served as a political
speechwriter and public policy advisor. His weekly columns are
published in newspapers across the country and on selected Internet
web sites, including Human Events Online, TheConservativeVoice.com and
GOPUSA.com, where he is a senior writer and state editor. Readers may
e-mail him at dougpat...@xxxxxxxx

--
Please feel free to view my movies athttp://www.youtube.com/timsmithfilmfestival

Since we have had six years of Bush ultra-conservatism, why not give a
socialist mixed economy a whirl. It works in Europe. Could it possibly
be any worse than the mess Bush has created?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bush is not a conservative. Yeah right. Europe is in such great shape.
Those
stupid lazy bastards are about to be taken over by Sharia law during
our lifetime
and overwhelmed by Islamic immigrants. Their cradle to grave Socialist
Utopia
has created a society of dependents who think the world owes them a
living.
Have you been to Europe lately. Major cities like London and Paris are
over
run with street beggars of the Islamic persuasion. Islamic radicals
live on
welfare payments from the state as they plan their next Jihad attacks
on their
hosts.

.

Loading