Re: Valerie Plame Wwas NOT Covert
- From: "Nebuchadnezzar II" <Nebuchadnezzar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:23:36 GMT
"Horatio Fudruckerton" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ss5uv25njdid70kr53ek3qqictuqop9fdg@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:59:26 -0400, "Nancy Porker Pelosi" <$20
Billion in pork at my dirty democrat house .gov> wrote:
The trial has provided convincing evidence that there was no
conspiracy to
punish Mr. Wilson by leaking Ms. Plame's identity -- and no evidence
that
she was, in fact, covert.
Liberal Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/06/AR2007030602020_pf.html
Well, if being concealed under a desk while giving a blowjob is
considered *covert*, then she may have been covert.
We're not interested in your sordid fantasies, Whoratio. She was
covert. So says the head of the CIA. Now you can eat *** with the
rest of your Reichtarded buddies who said she wasn't.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Plame_hearing_transcript_0316.html
Have a nice day.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: 1/3 of Democrats Illiterate
- Next by Date: Re: White House Seeking Gonzales Replacements
- Previous by thread: Re: White House Seeking Gonzales Replacements
- Next by thread: Re: What Did Chuck Schumer Know and When Did He Know It?
- Index(es):