Re: 911/ Why no planes?
- From: "Beacon of Truth and Light \(maybe\)" <foo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:51:48 GMT
"Horateo Fudruckerten" <none> wrote in message
news:ud3u62h9t9aop1ktgb86bumft03krnm7se@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 19 May 2006 12:18:21 -0700, "iceman" <iceman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Nothing quite brings out USG shills disinfos as any mention of lack of any
plane evidence. I kid you not--
No matter which forum, a radio show, suddenly these same shills who were
anti-pod, become hysterically pro-"pod", or whatever, And they they
attempt
to get the person on the defensive and demand "well, what was it?" (The
right answer is "I don't Know." This pisses them off, because they were
already to jump on you with "tin hat" conspiracy, etcc..... "I don't know"
doesn't advance any theory at all, but those 19 hijackers on ghost planes
is
the real wacko conspiracy theory.
Clearly the discovery of the absence of planes is far more threatening to
the WH, than the pod, or other explanations.
You need some serious help. I hope you're posting from an
asylum.
Why? Are you saying we should automatically believe everything that the
government told the newspapers to print?
Did you look at the actual evidence? Weren't you concerned by odd
discrepancies? Are you capable of actually thinking for yourself??
I'll tell you what I believe in, and that's the LAWS OF PHYSICS. I don't
believe in magic bullets or any crap that blatantly contradicts reality, no
matter how 'official' the explanation is.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bush has an Altzheimers' Moment
- Next by Date: Re: Hilarious! Al Gore at his best!!
- Previous by thread: Bush has an Altzheimers' Moment
- Next by thread: Re: Hilarious! Al Gore at his best!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
