Re: What loser is the libs going to nominate in 2008 ?


"Horatio Fudruckerten" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hc5br15p4da0ah7b46bnjtld107jlh4a9j@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> I'm sure he/she or it is going to represent their party with
> the usual liberal dim lies and smears. Hitlery is already lying.

And Busche would never do such a thing, right?

> She is representing herself as in the *middle*; when it is a
> known fact that she is a *trained and educated* marxist.

a lie and a smear... hypocrite

> Surely the libs aren't stupid enough to run kerry again.
> But, on the other hand, they ARE pretty stupid. After all,

Statistically, rightards have lower IQs

> they ran him in 2000 which was a joke. LMAO.

woah!! like there was landslide...

> Then there is the screaming loon howie dean. By all means,
> run the man. I like watching him self destruct.
>
> Who else do they have ? Fat drunken teddy kennedy ? LMAO.

....because Busche never drank, right?...

> He couldn't stay sober long enough to stay awake during the
> campaign speeches.
>
> Maybe they could run michelle moore. They LOVE that little
> fat ***. And he lies as good as any of them.

another lie and smear...

> Don't have much to choose from, do they ? They could have
> run tookie williams if they could have gotten him off. They
> tried hard enough.
> How about babsy streisand ? Now there's a winner !!
> MUAHAHAHAHA. Liberals could fight over who is going
> to get to fill her toilet bowl every morning with roses.
> I see nothing for the lib dims in 2008 except more of the same
> losing dipshits. Really sad. ...........no, not really.
>
> I'm going to LOVE 2008.

And this whole NG will LOVE reposting this when some complete nobody gets
elected on the not-being-a-warmongering-rightard platform...







.

Quantcast