Re: Two US ships attacked, but Bush "doesn't really care"
- From: z <z@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:46:41 -0500
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Mk2Oe.8909$Wi6.1912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Voter wrote:
>
>> Two Navy ships were fired upon by rockets in Jordan last week, the
>> attack being the work of al Qaeda.
>>
>> Remember the right wing media went after Clinton after the bombing of
>> the USS Cole?
>
> There's a vast difference.
>
> Clinton hadn't gone to war yet, so his inaction over the U.S.S. Cole
> was significant.
>
> But now we're already at war.
> We should expect counterattacks from the enemy.
>
> Here's a clue: It wasn't till 1944 (4 years after war had begun) that
> Germany started hitting Britain with V-2 ballistic missiles. Nobody
> blamed Churchill for that. They continued to blame his appeasing
> precedessor, Chamberlain.
>
>
It is funny the news called the attackers 'terrorists' -- its not a
terrorist act to fire rockets at war ships. Thats what the enemey is
supposed to do.
.
- References:
- Two US ships attacked, but Bush "doesn't really care"
- From: Voter
- Re: Two US ships attacked, but Bush "doesn't really care"
- From: Steven L.
- Two US ships attacked, but Bush "doesn't really care"
- Prev by Date: Re: And all soldiers should come from families who voted for Bush.
- Next by Date: Re: Krugman's Big Lie
- Previous by thread: Re: Two US ships attacked, but Bush "doesn't really care"
- Next by thread: Re: Getting Israelis out of Palestinian land ....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
