City wants back rent from Kelo residents
- From: "jose" <josefsoplar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Aug 2005 11:45:29 -0700
City wants back rent from Kelo residents
Expects homeowners who lost case to pay hundreds of thousands
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
In the adding insult to injury category, the city officials that
triumphed over a group of Connecticut homeowners in a landmark Supreme
Court property-rights case are expecting those residents to pay the
local government rent dating back to the year 2000.
The June 23 Supreme Court ruling in Kelo v. City of New London gave the
town the approval to seize the residents' homes and transfer them to a
private party for development of an office complex. In the highly
controversial decision, the justices ruled 5-4 that the economic
development resulting from the eminent domain action qualified as
"public use" under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
The city now says that since it won the case, the homeowners actually
have been living on city property since 2000 when it first began
condemnation procedures against them, so they must pay back rent - to
the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
"It's a new definition of chutzpah: Confiscate land and charge back
rent for the years the owners fought confiscation," wrote Jonathan
O'Connell in the Fairfield County Weekly.
Not only is the city demanding rent, but the buyout offers on the table
are based on the market rate as it was in 2000, before most of the
growth in the current real-estate bubble.
The New London Development Corporation, the semi-public organization
hired by the city to facilitate the deal, first addressed the rent
issue in a June 2004 letter to residents, calling the alleged debt
retroactive "use and occupancy" payments.
"We know your clients did not expect to live in city-owned property for
free, or rent out that property and pocket the profits, if they
ultimately lost the case," the agency said. It warned that "this
problem will only get worse with the passage of time," and that the
city was prepared to sue for the money if need be.
The Kelo case is named after Susette Kelo, who owns a single-family
house in New London with her husband. Kelo was told she would owe
around $57,000 in rent.
"I'd leave here broke," Kelo told the weekly. "I wouldn't have a home
or any money to get one. I could probably get a large-size refrigerator
box and live under the bridge."
Matt Dery owns four houses on the building site, including the home his
87-year-old mother was born in and still lives in. Dery's past-due
rent, according to the city, exceeds $300,000.
It remains to be seen if a suit will be filed against the residents.
"From a political standpoint, the city might be better off trying to
reach some settlement with the homeowners," Jeremy Paul, an associate
UConn law dean who teaches property law, told the paper.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: City wants back rent from Kelo residents
- From: Baldin Pramer
- Re: City wants back rent from Kelo residents
- Prev by Date: Islamic radicals demand guilty verdict for Christians
- Next by Date: Gaza evacuation 'beginning of Israel's destruction'
- Previous by thread: Islamic radicals demand guilty verdict for Christians
- Next by thread: Re: City wants back rent from Kelo residents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading