Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Robert Coe <bob@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:47:36 -0500
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:13:30 -0500, Peter N <peternew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
: On 2/3/2011 10:02 PM, Savageduck wrote:
: > On 2011-02-03 18:50:40 -0800, Robert Coe <bob@xxxxxxxx> said:
: >
: >> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:48:29 +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg
: >> <ozcvgtt02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >> : Peter N <peternew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >> : > If this format performs as claimed and it adapted, it could end
: >> the debate.
: >> :
: >> : > Claim: lossless JPEG.
: >> :
: >> : >
: >> <http://www.sdtimes.com/content/resources.aspx?ShowOnlyResourceID=400&RefID=SpecialNeeds2.2>
: >>
: > :
: > :
: >>
: >> You are aware that at least Canon's RAW is already compressed by the
: >> : lossless JPEG method?
: >> :
: >> : In other news, the new century began on the first of January 1901.
: >>
: >> Indeed it did. And I won't embarrass you by suggesting that you don't
: >> know
: >> that it wasn't *this* new century. ;^)
: >>
: >> Bob
: >
: > Yup! That was January 1, 2001.
: >
:
: January 1, 2000.
Bzzzzzzt!! 2000 was the last year of the twentieth century. You could say it's
the year after which the twentieth century was named.
Bob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Peter N
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Savageduck
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- References:
- possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Peter N
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Robert Coe
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Savageduck
- Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- From: Peter N
- possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- Prev by Date: Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- Next by Date: Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- Previous by thread: Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- Next by thread: Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
