Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate

On 2011-02-03 18:50:40 -0800, Robert Coe <bob@xxxxxxxx> said:

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:48:29 +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg
<ozcvgtt02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: Peter N <peternew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > If this format performs as claimed and it adapted, it could end the debate.
:
: > Claim: lossless JPEG.
:
: > <http://www.sdtimes.com/content/resources.aspx?ShowOnlyResourceID=400&RefID=SpecialNeeds2.2>
:
:

You are aware that at least Canon's RAW is already compressed by the
: lossless JPEG method?
:
: In other news, the new century began on the first of January 1901.

Indeed it did. And I won't embarrass you by suggesting that you don't know
that it wasn't *this* new century. ;^)

Bob

Yup! That was January 1, 2001.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
    ... On 2/3/2011 10:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: ... :> If this format performs as claimed and it adapted, ... the debate. ... :> Claim: lossless JPEG. ...
    (alt.photography)
  • Re: possible end to jpeg v raw debate
    ... :> If this format performs as claimed and it adapted, it could end the debate. ... :> Claim: lossless JPEG. ... And I won't embarrass you by suggesting that you don't know ...
    (alt.photography)