Re: jpeg or raw?
- From: "Peter" <peternew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:15:04 -0400
"Corporate Photographer London" <grant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:2e0cc844-f3b9-4033-9634-c8b01eff490e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am a corporate photographer shooting for a variety of clients. I
supply high res jpges and to date have had no requests for raw files.
Should I change and start offering this option? I know raw are better
files, but do clients need them? Does anyone else supply corporate
clients with raw files? Grant
Those raw files are a possible means of generating future earnings. they are the digital equivalent of negatives, in the film days. I would not offer them unless asked. In that case charge accordingly.
--
Peter
.
- References:
- jpeg or raw?
- From: Corporate Photographer London
- jpeg or raw?
- Prev by Date: Re: Beyond blue to dull white/gray skies
- Next by Date: Re: jpeg or raw?
- Previous by thread: Re: jpeg or raw?
- Next by thread: Re: jpeg or raw?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|