Re: jpeg or raw?
- From: Robert Coe <bob@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:07:21 -0400
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 01:00:51 -0700 (PDT), Corporate Photographer London
<grant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: I am a corporate photographer shooting for a variety of clients. I
: supply high res jpges and to date have had no requests for raw files.
: Should I change and start offering this option? I know raw are better
: files, but do clients need them? Does anyone else supply corporate
: clients with raw files? Grant
My clients always want JPEGs, in low (for the Web) or high (for print
reproduction) resolution. But I always shoot RAW, for two reasons: you get
better JPEGs that way, and I can always go back and start over if I ever need
the picture cropped differently or colorized differently or whatever.
I'm not an independent professional photographer, but photography is part of
my day job. My clients are internal Web developers or maintainers and printers
or graphic designers engaged by my employer for specific projects. So far, I
don't believe I've encountered any who would know what I was talking about if
I offered them RAW files. I've offered a client TIFF files a couple of times,
but they didn't take me up on it.
Bob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: jpeg or raw?
- From: Peter
- Re: jpeg or raw?
- References:
- jpeg or raw?
- From: Corporate Photographer London
- jpeg or raw?
- Prev by Date: Re: jpeg or raw?
- Next by Date: Re: Underexposed pictures
- Previous by thread: Re: jpeg or raw?
- Next by thread: Re: jpeg or raw?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
