Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- From: "Charles E Hardwidge" <boing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:25:26 +0100
"Pete" <available.on.request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2010061122385016316-availableonrequest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Macbeth does not work for colours that aren't on the chart. The camera
reviews that include a Macbeth colour checker show this very clearly.
Corporate colours are rarely on the chart, at least, not for long ;-
My pictures are taken from quite a distance and illuminated by a mixture
of twilight, sodium, mercury vapour, and various fluorescent lamps. All
sources are at different angles; the location and influence of some
sources vary considerably during the required shutter interval.
To its credit, auto white balance produces the most aesthetically pleasing
colour rendition and tonal differentiation yet it is, understandably,
hopelessly wrong from a corporate standpoint. Until I get this figured out
I have no chance of getting my images accepted for anything other than
entertainment.
I'm 99.999% sure I'll never achieve my goal so I must learn to enjoy the
journey instead - I may achieve that one...
I've got a Macbeth chart but apart from using it to create a custom DNG
profile have pretty much done nothing with it. Not really sure what to do
with it apart from the grey patch, and I have a card for that.
Ouch.
One option I'd thought of was to blend multiple images of different white
balances. Ricoh (in the links) are taking a ham fisted stab at that.
The brain handles post-processing very well even under insane lighting
conditions. If I had a better grip on the maths it would be tempting to have
a mess with writing a plugin.
Links:
http://www.ricoh.com/technology/tech/026.html
http://cameradojo.com/2009/05/31/spydercube-white-balance-tool-a-must-have-gadget/
http://blog.christhedunn.com/2009/03/19/white-balance-is-a-little-trickster/
http://community.acdsee.com/pro/2009/06/the-whys-of-white-balance-variable-light-contd/
http://www.colorcube.com/illusions/chrmadpt.htm
--
Charles E Hardwidge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- From: Charles E Hardwidge
- Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- References:
- Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- From: Charles E Hardwidge
- Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- From: Peter
- Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- From: Pete
- Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- Prev by Date: Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- Next by Date: Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- Previous by thread: Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- Next by thread: Re: Adobe Lightroom 3.0 and DxO Optics Pro 6.2 Test
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|