Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- From: Alan Browne <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:34:05 -0500
RahQ5@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Which is better? I got a Sony Alpha 350 for Xmas, with 2 lens that don't
seem to have IS. The 18-70 and the 75-300.
According to the manual, it is in the camera. Is there any difference in
quality?
I have to buy CF cards for it, which is surprising, since I thought all
Sonys used only MS cards.Probably have to go to Ebay for a MS/CF adapter
for it if I want to use memory sticks. Thanks!
The Sony cameras are, at heart, Minolta. Sony have not removed CF capability as CF is what most photogs use.
In camera anti-shake is not as effective as in-lens IS/VR. You can expect 2 stops (maybe a bit more) of effectiveness v. 3 - 4 stops with in-lens IS/VR.
Advantage is that all Sony (Minolta) lenses will benefit from the anti-shake.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- From: ray
- Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- From: Steven Wandy
- Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- References:
- In-camera/In-lens IS
- From: RahQ5
- In-camera/In-lens IS
- Prev by Date: It may not be the lens..
- Next by Date: Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- Previous by thread: Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- Next by thread: Re: In-camera/In-lens IS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|