Re: High speed camera vs. HD video


"AKA gray asphalt" <benvhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xXsOj.167785$nr1.119043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Burgerman" <burgerman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uuaOj.50167$Ff4.16383@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snip

Yes. Its a point and shoot! Noisy, low image quality, does not compare to
a real Digital SLR. Great for snaps. Unusable for printing high quality
20x30 prints unless you are very easily pleased!

That's not what the reviews say. You obviously
haven't used one. They haven't even been
available until last week in the US. So I know you
are bsing. Who wants 20x30 prints for wedding
photos?



Not many of my past wedding customers wanted 2030 wall prints, except for
the really upscale ones, but a 16x20, matted and framed of the bride and
groom was purchased about 90% of the time. In many cases, three were
purchased (I gave a discount for that), one for the couple and one for each
parent. I suspect tht I would have solf far fewer of them if I hadn't been
shooting 6x7 negatives.


.