Re: Film vs Digital
- From: floyd@xxxxxxxxxx (Floyd L. Davidson)
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:27:04 -0800
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter wrote:
"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:us6dnb177Y-hYXfanZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peter wrote:OK, that's a fair comment. I suspect that since the
"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:GZ6dnc2ibOv0kHTanZ2dnUVZ_oqhnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Joel wrote:
And it could be hundred(s) of millions of dollars,
I can't remember. I
don't remember seeing the camera (?) to know how
big it was, but an article
and few samples. I believe it was film camera, but I may be wrong.
The problem is not with the technology but in the
way approach has deteriorated.
Are you complaining that once we're free of the
tyranny of the expense of film, some of us are
becoming more experimental in our work?
No. I'm saying that gimmick has replaced experiment.
first cave drawings appeared, some no talents have
tried to replace art with "gee whiz" special
effects. Simply because some do this, is no reason to
try to socially ban all such attempts.
As a prior poster pointed out, photography is often
thought of strictly as a medium for recording a
snapshot in time. According to this line, any
manipulation is heresy. Whether and to what extent I
accept manipulation depends upon the purpose for
creating the image.
Similarly there is a vast difference between a "I've
been there" postcard and an artistic
interpretation. If the latter includes a manipulation,
so be it.
Art is a window to the soul, as cave paintings express so well. When
manipulation is the rule, art is soulless cartoon fantasy.
A cave painting is nothing but manipulation. That *is*
where the "art" exists (in the manipulation). Without
artistic manipulation, what is left is "cartoon fantasy".
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Re: Film vs Digital
- References:
- Film vs Digital
- From: Pumper Hinkle
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Vance
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Vance
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Peter
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Peter
- Re: Film vs Digital
- From: Roy Jose Lorr
- Film vs Digital
- Prev by Date: Re: Film vs Digital
- Next by Date: Re: Film vs Digital
- Previous by thread: Re: Film vs Digital
- Next by thread: Re: Film vs Digital
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|