alt.photography

• Date Index

---

• Picture was moving/blurred, Jay
  • Re: Picture was moving/blurred, Jason Schoenrock
• review cameras, jim
• Best Places for Buying Mat Board, Evan Reader
• Tripod advice, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: Tripod advice, Not4wood
    • Re: Tripod advice, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: Tripod advice, Not4wood
  • Re: Tripod advice, Colin_D
  • Re: Tripod advice, Floyd L. Davidson
  • Re: Tripod advice, Pat
  • Re: Tripod advice, dadiOH
• D200 or the 40D, Jay
  • Re: D200 or the 40D, Paul Burdett
  • Re: D200 or the 40D, Chris H
    • Re: D200 or the 40D, Tully
  • Re: D200 or the 40D, flambe
    • Re: D200 or the 40D, Not4wood
      • Re: D200 or the 40D, No Person known
    • Re: D200 or the 40D, No Person known
  • Re: D200 or the 40D, Peter
  • Re: D200 or the 40D, Jay
• Check out my new pics, La Coquette
  • Re: Check out my new pics, VilleBill
  • Message not available
    • Re: Check out my new pics, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Check out my new pics, Paul Furman
      • Re: Check out my new pics, Jason Schoenrock
  • Re: Check out my new pics, The One
    • Re: Check out my new pics, Chris H
• [Photo] Rav Color, Gianni
• Re: EXCELLENCY IN PHOTOGRAPHY CONTEST, Mr. Strat
  • Re: EXCELLENCY IN PHOTOGRAPHY CONTEST, Not4wood
• Without a mask, Phoenix
  • Re: Without a mask, The Spider Formally Seated Next To Little Miss Muffet
• Lumières d'Opale : Album n° 23 "Silvery Opal", Lumières d'Opale
• req: Canon wide angle zoom recommendation, Bob
  • Re: Canon wide angle zoom recommendation, Paul Burdett
• see me now, Exquisite
• Re: Santa Girl, Frank Arthur
• Christmas Greetings!, Dwight Beers
  • Re: Christmas Greetings!, Not4wood
    • Re: Christmas Greetings!, DOUBLE-ACES
      • Re: Christmas Greetings!, DOUBLE-ACES
      • Re: Christmas Greetings!, Not4wood
• Find A Partner Forum, marketing
• Re: A "Last Christmas" Montage, Billy Boy
• Pentax, John
  • Re: Pentax, OG
    • Re: Pentax, John
      • Re: Pentax, roentarre
  • Re: Pentax, Dave
  • Message not available
    • Re: Pentax, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Pentax, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: Pentax, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Pentax, Rob Morley
      • Re: Pentax, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: Pentax, Rob Morley
      • Re: Pentax, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: Pentax, Dave Cohen
      • Re: Pentax, VilleBill
      • Re: Pentax, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Pentax, Dave Cohen
      • Re: Pentax, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pentax, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax, Dave Cohen
      • Re: Pentax, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax, ray
  • Re: Pentax, The Spider Formally Seated Next To Little Miss Muffet
    • Re: Pentax, simon
  • Re: Pentax, Net Doe
• macro flash query, Paul Burdett
  • Re: macro flash query, dadiOH
    • Re: macro flash query, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Re: macro flash query, Burt Johnson
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Burt Johnson
      • depth of field, Burt Johnson
      • Re: depth of field, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
      • Re: macro flash query, Burt Johnson
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
      • Re: macro flash query, dadiOH
  • Re: macro flash query, Bruce
  • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
    • Re: macro flash query, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
  • Re: macro flash query, Ken Hart
    • Re: macro flash query, Floyd L. Davidson
  • Re: macro flash query, SteveB
  • Re: macro flash query, Floyd L. Davidson
    • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
      • Re: macro flash query, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, www.kevinkienlein.com
      • Re: macro flash query, Rob Morley
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: macro flash query, Peter
  • Re: macro flash query, roentarre
  • Re: macro flash query, Not4wood
    • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
      • Re: macro flash query, Paul Burdett
• Very basic question on lens, shakey
  • Re: Very basic question on lens, Rob Morley
    • Re: Very basic question on lens, shakey
      • Message not available
      • Re: Very basic question on lens, Robert Coe
  • Re: Very basic question on lens, Ken Hart
    • Re: Very basic question on lens, Rob Morley
• Scanning instamatic film, Robert Peirce
• to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Followfocus Productions
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Pete D
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, AxisOfBeagles
    • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Robert Coe
    • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, roentarre
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Scott W
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Mr. Strat
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Frank Arthur
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Rob Morley
    • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Rob Morley
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Prisilla, Queen of the Desert
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Mr. Strat
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
      • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Mr. Strat
    • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Peter
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Chris H
  • Re: to the Flamers and jerks who have no life, Robert Coe
• Funny and interesting things before Christmas, f.b.
  • Nothing funny - just more spam!, Frank Arthur
• HAI!!! FRIEND, rr
  • Message not available
    • Re: HAI!!! FRIEND, roentarre
• Absolutely awesome, Jemma
  • Re: Absolutely awesome, SteveB
    • Re: Absolutely awesome, glen black
  • Re: Absolutely awesome, Tom
  • Re: Absolutely awesome, Pete D
• Dust, Steve
  • Re: Dust, Rob Morley
    • Re: Dust, Steve
  • Re: Dust, Paul Furman
• Problems with a VOSONIC by www.powerinnunmbers.com & Vasa Carapic, Skartarys
• christmas soon..., dyangabri@xxxxxxxxx
• This chick is hot, chickie babe
  • Re: This chick is hot, ray
  • Re: This chick is hot - NOT, Colin_D
    • Re: This chick is hot - NOT, ray
      • Re: This chick is hot - NOT, AxisOfBeagles
• Funny things before Christmas, f.b.
  • Re: Funny things before Christmas, Mr. Strat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Funny things before Christmas, f.b.
• wedding photo equipment question, Gauthier Michel
  • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Paul Burdett
  • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Ken Hart
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Colin_D
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Gordon Hudson
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Ken Hart
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Tully
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Robert Coe
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Scott W
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Ken Hart
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Scott W
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Not4wood
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Tully
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Robert Coe
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Ken Hart
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Gauthier Michel
  • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Not4wood
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
    • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Gauthier Michel
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Ken Hart
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Message not available
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Peter
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Peter
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Peter
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Skinner1
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Message not available
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, dadiOH
      • Message not available
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Chris H
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Not4wood
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, May
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Ken Hart
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, May
      • Re: wedding photo equipment question, Mr. Strat
• 3-d photography, Marian Moore
  • Re: 3-d photography, Mr. Strat
  • Re: 3-d photography, Bradley K. Sherman
    • Re: 3-d photography, Marian Moore
  • Re: 3-d photography, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: 3-d photography, OG
  • Re: 3-d photography, Pat
  • Re: 3-d photography, Jeff R.
    • Re: 3-d photography, Marian Moore
      • Re: 3-d photography, Jeff R.
      • Re: 3-d photography, Jeff R.
• Distance, Eric
  • Re: Distance, The 2-Belo
    • Re: Distance, Pat
  • Re: Distance, Rob Morley
  • Re: Distance, mark . thomas . 7
  • Re: Distance, Scott W
    • Re: Distance, DBLEXPOSURE
  • Re: Distance, Eric
    • Re: Distance, DBLEXPOSURE
• cameras review, lawryy
• Re: young attractive girl, Leech Bleeder
• 2nd hand DSLR's, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris Hills
    • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris Hills
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Pete D
      • Message not available
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris Hills
      • Message not available
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Steve
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris H
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris H
      • Message not available
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris H
  • Message not available
    • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Tully
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Chris H
      • Re: 2nd hand DSLR's, Bruce
• Flickr vs Shutterfly, rhertz
  • Re: Flickr vs Shutterfly, Paul Furman
  • Re: Flickr vs Shutterfly, (PeteCresswell)
  • Re: Flickr vs Shutterfly, AxisOfBeagles
    • Re: Flickr vs Shutterfly, (PeteCresswell)
      • Re: Flickr vs Shutterfly, Doug Chadduck
• SD memory chips hold image, L
  • Message not available
    • Re: SD memory chips hold image, ray
  • Message not available
    • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Frank Arthur
  • Re: SD memory chips hold image, cellscribe
    • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Dave Cohen
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, cellscribe
  • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Colin_D
    • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Steve
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Jasper
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Rob Morley
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Tom
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Rob Morley
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Steve
      • Re: SD memory chips hold image, Colin_D
• Sneer proof camera?, cellscribe
  • Re: Sneer proof camera?, Robert Coe
    • Re: Sneer proof camera?, Rob Bradford
  • Re: Sneer proof camera?, Pat
  • Re: Sneer proof camera?, Ken Hart
    • Re: Sneer proof camera?, Paul Furman
• Digital frame HELP, kimweber
  • Re: Digital frame HELP, Rob Morley
    • Re: Digital frame HELP, kimweber via PhotoKB.com
  • Re: Digital frame HELP, Doug Chadduck
    • Re: Digital frame HELP, kimweber via PhotoKB.com
  • Re: Digital frame HELP, ray
• question 35 mm vs digital, Duke Of Earl
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Ken Hart
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Frank Arthur
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Duke Of Earl
    • Message not available
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Not4wood
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Not4wood
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Duke Of Earl
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Frank Arthur
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, mark . thomas . 7
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, mark . thomas . 7
    • Message not available
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Duke Of Earl
    • Message not available
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Duke Of Earl
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, John Klijnen
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Ernest
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Ken Hart
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Michael
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Colin_D
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Ken Hart
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Colin_D
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, rwalker
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, David Azose
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tully
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, VilleBill
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Not4wood
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Not4wood
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Ken Hart
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
    • Message not available
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Message not available
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Colin_D
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Colin_D
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Ken Hart
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, rhertz
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Unspam
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Colin_D
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, SteveB
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tedski
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tully
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, krishnananda
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Peter
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, dj_nme
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, dj_nme
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, dj_nme
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris Hills
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Michael
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Message not available
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tedski
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tedski
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tedski
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Mr. Strat
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Bruce
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Chris H
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Noons
  • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Lee A. Wentzel
    • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, ray
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Scott W
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Rob Morley
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Marvin
      • Re: question 35 mm vs digital, Tedski
• why one needs a view finder, mm
  • Re: why one needs a view finder, dennis@home
    • Re: why one needs a view finder, Pete D
  • Re: why one needs a view finder, ray
    • Re: why one needs a view finder, Mr. Strat
      • Re: why one needs a view finder, ray
      • Re: why one needs a view finder, Mr. Strat
      • Message not available
      • Re: why one needs a view finder, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: why one needs a view finder, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: why one needs a view finder, Mr. Strat
      • Message not available
      • Re: why one needs a view finder, Mr. Strat
  • Re: why one needs a view finder, Mr. Strat
  • Re: why one needs a view finder, Dave Cohen
  • Re: why one needs a view finder, Marvin
• Is photography dead?, Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Is photography dead?, AxisOfBeagles
  • Re: Is photography dead?, Frank Arthur
• Lens Recommendation, Jason Schoenrock
  • Re: Lens Recommendation, AxisOfBeagles
    • Re: Lens Recommendation, Paul Burdett
  • Re: Lens Recommendation, DBLEXPOSURE
    • Re: Lens Recommendation, Jason Schoenrock
      • Re: Lens Recommendation, DBLEXPOSURE
  • Message not available
    • Re: Lens Recommendation, Jason Schoenrock
• Found New Ebook Site For Photography and Others [Free], rebratted
• Cannon S2 IS, RSJ
  • Message not available
    • Re: Cannon S2 IS, melon
  • Re: Cannon S2 IS, Earnest
  • Re: Cannon S2 IS, Mr. Strat
• If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, mm
  • Message not available
    • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, ejay
      • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, Frank Arthur
      • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, DBLEXPOSURE
  • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, Tedski
    • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, mm
      • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, DBLEXPOSURE
  • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, Frank Arthur
  • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, Earnest
    • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, mm
      • Re: If the Fujica S5700 is not a SLR, why can't I see through the viewfinder when the lens cap is on?, Cats
• Strap length, mm
  • Re: Strap length, Mr. Strat
    • Re: Strap length, mm
      • Re: Strap length, Mr. Strat
    • Re: Strap length, Robert Coe
      • Re: Strap length, Scott W
      • Re: Strap length, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Strap length, Robert Coe
      • Re: Strap length, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Strap length, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Strap length, Mr. Strat
    • Re: Strap length, Not4wood
      • Re: Strap length, mm
    • Re: Strap length, Michael Brown
    • Re: Strap length, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: Strap length, ray
  • Re: Strap length, theclyde
  • Re: Strap length, Pat
    • Re: Strap length, mm
  • Re: Strap length, Frank Arthur
    • Re: Strap length, ejay
      • Re: Strap length, Frank Arthur
  • Re: Strap length, Ernest
  • Re: Strap length, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: Strap length, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
• sea water, mm
  • Re: sea water, Pat
  • Re: sea water, AxisOfBeagles
    • Re: sea water, mm
    • Re: sea water, Robert Coe
  • Re: sea water, Scott W
    • Re: sea water, mm
      • Re: sea water, Ursus Californicus
      • Message not available
      • Re: sea water, Rob Morley
    • Re: sea water, Paul Furman
      • Re: sea water, bill gorley
• I need a camera for time lapse photography, e . david6
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, AxisOfBeagles
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Frank Arthur
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, ray
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Ken Hart
    • Message not available
      • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, e . david6
      • Message not available
      • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, e . david6
      • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, e . david6
      • Message not available
      • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Paul Furman
      • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, e . david6
      • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Paul Furman
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Burt Johnson
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Chris Hills
    • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Paul Furman
  • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography, Mark F
    • Re: I need a camera for time lapse photography (updating and correcting typo), Mark F
• model available for photographic work, JaeJay
  • Re: model available for photographic work, Mr. Strat
    • Re: model available for photographic work, Burt Johnson
• Mamiya C220, Bruce
  • Re: Mamiya C220, Rob Bradford
• New pictures in my Gallery from Oldenburg, Germany, Lars from Denmark
• Photo - Sunset, Gianni
  • Re: Photo - Sunset, Billy Boy
    • Re: Photo - Sunset, Gianni
  • Re: Photo - Sunset, Doug Chadduck
  • Re: Photo - Sunset, Frank Arthur
    • Re: Photo - Sunset, Ursus Californicus
  • Re: Photo - Sunset, Burt Johnson
  • Re: Photo - Sunset, mark . thomas . 7
• Re: Original JPG <bg>, The One
• Model available, JaeJay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • model available, JaeJay
    • Re: model available, Mr. Strat
  • model available, JaeJay
• Portraits from Mali, Vincent de Groot
  • Re: Portraits from Mali, Al Parker
  • Re: Portraits from Mali, Scott W
• Re: Newer LightRoom v1.3.1 and ARC v4.3.1 available, Not4wood
• Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, Mr.Muppster
  • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, AxisOfBeagles
    • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
    • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, Mike Dobony
      • Message not available
      • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, Mr.Muppster
  • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, RsH
  • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, ray
  • Re: Opinions on high zoom cameras pls, flambe
• 'Cold' - photographs from Antarctica, T.Heslenfeld
  • Re: 'Cold' - photographs from Antarctica, Peter Stavrakoglou
  • Re: 'Cold' - photographs from Antarctica, AxisOfBeagles
• Jar Photos, winrymarini
• Photos of clothes?, Mad Ad
  • Re: Photos of clothes?, Jeff R.
    • Re: Photos of clothes?, roentarre
    • Re: Photos of clothes?, Mad Ad
• new site from ITALY, News by Tin.it
  • Re: new site from ITALY, Frank Arthur
    • Re: new site from ITALY, roentarre
• my new website and blog, alessio . dezotti
  • Re: my new website and blog, roentarre
• Question re JAlbum, Walter R.
  • Re: Question re JAlbum, art2u
• Re: Photo framing, Morty McSnerd
  • Re: Photo framing, DBLEXPOSURE
  • Re: Photo framing, Paul Furman
    • Re: Photo framing, DBLEXPOSURE
• 3 new photographs on my site, Jasper
  • Re: 3 new photographs on my site, AxisOfBeagles
    • Re: 3 new photographs on my site, Jasper
• 5 Vintage Antique KODAK BROWNIE Cameras: Box, Folding.. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330194290866, ,./,,.,.
• Photos, Followfocus Productions
  • Re: Photos, hunter
  • Re: Photos, The One
    • Re: Photos, Chris Hills
    • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
    • Re: Photos, Followfocus Productions
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Photos, Chris H
      • Re: Photos, Scott W
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Photos, Chris H
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Photos, Chris H
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Photos, Chris H
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
      • Re: Photos, Chris H
      • Re: Photos, Rob Morley
      • Re: Photos, ssim
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
  • Re: Photos, Lee A. Wentzel
    • Re: Photos, Followfocus Productions
    • Re: Photos, DOUBLE-ACES
  • Re: Photos, Beamer
    • Re: Photos, Followfocus Productions
      • Re: Photos, AxisOfBeagles
      • Re: Photos, Mr. Strat
  • Re: Photos, OG
    • Re: Photos, Chris H
  • Re: Photos, Chris H
• Dreaming of a career as a photographer?, dreamjobsmb
  • Re: Dreaming of a career as a photographer?, Mr. Strat
  • Message not available
    • Re: Dreaming of a career as a photographer?, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Re: Dreaming of a career as a photographer?, dadiOH
• Inexpensive Stock Photos, DexImage Collection of stock photography images, 185 Discs, other ..., ola@xxxxxxx
• Re: New photo website, George90
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New photo website, AxisOfBeagles
• Re: How can I post images on the Web?, jrblack10
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How can I post images on the Web?, Cats
• 3 photos - amateur, Sbosic
  • Re: 3 photos - amateur, Jasper
• web banner, cd cover, print materials, web extras, mascot for sale.., ronnyojci
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • web banner, cd cover, print materials, web extras, mascot for sale.., johnsq3a
• My Photos, f.b.
• Re: Copyright, Mike Dobony
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Copyright, Mike Dobony
  • Re: Copyright, Mike Dobony
• Shooting Fireworks - Photography tips for Holiday, arun
  • Re: Shooting Fireworks - Photography tips for Holiday, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: Shooting Fireworks - Photography tips for Holiday, The One
• IMPACT PRO GALLERIES, Classy
• Holster Type Bag for Canon 40D with battery grip, Chris Down
• battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., mm
  • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., DBLEXPOSURE
    • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., mm
  • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
    • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., mm
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., mm
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility betwe..., VilleBill
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibilitybetwe..., DBLEXPOSURE
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibilitybetwe..., VilleBill
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download portcompatibilitybetwe..., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
    • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., Rob Morley
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., Rob Morley
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: battery, charger, memory, and download port compatibility between a 250 dollar camera and a 150 dollar one., mm
• Paper, Mzm34ay
  • Message not available
    • Re: Paper, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: Paper, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: Paper, ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: Paper, ray
  • Re: Paper, DBLEXPOSURE
  • Re: Paper, Ken Hart
  • Message not available
    • Re: Paper, Mike Dobony
      • Message not available
      • Re: Paper, kati . mwilkins
      • Re: Paper, Al Dykes
• Re: Mamiya C330, Rob Bradford
• Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, mm
  • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
    • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, mm
      • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
      • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, mm
      • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, mm
    • Re: Batteries wear out in new camera, \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
• Re: Selling work on the web, Petri Lopia
• Re: hello, Frank Arthur
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: hello, Celcius
• Re: The Quik Pod(R) DSLR handheld camera system from Fromm Works Inc. serves the needs of photographers and photo journalists worldwide., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: The Quik Pod(R) DSLR handheld camera system from Fromm Works Inc. serves the needs of photographers and photo journalists worldwide., Rob Morley
    • Re: The Quik Pod(R) DSLR handheld camera system from Fromm Works Inc. serves the needs of photographers and photo journalists worldwide., \(not quite so\) Fat Sam
  • Re: The Quik Pod(R) DSLR handheld camera system from Fromm Works Inc. serves the needs of photographers and photo journalists worldwide., Frank Arthur
  • Re: The Quik Pod(R) DSLR handheld camera system from Fromm Works Inc. serves the needs of photographers and photo journalists worldwide., rushprnews@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Quik Pod(R) DSLR handheld camera system from Fromm Works Inc. serves the needs of photographers and photo journalists worldwide., rushprnews@xxxxxxxxx
• Canon CCD Image Sensor Service Notice (Recall) - My Personal Experience, Paul Michaels
  • Re: Canon CCD Image Sensor Service Notice (Recall) - My Personal Experience, bitwisebob
  • Re: Canon CCD Image Sensor Service Notice (Recall) - My Personal Experience, Morton
• Re: Digital SLR, Not4wood
• Re: F-stops & Depth-Of-Field, Not4wood
• Re: RAW vs JPG?, rwalker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RAW vs JPG?, rwalker
    • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
  • Re: RAW vs JPG?, rwalker
  • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
    • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Richard . Polhill
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, rwalker
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, OG
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Not4wood
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, No Person known
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, DBLEXPOSURE
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Richard . Polhill
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, OG
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, John Klijnen
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Richard . Polhill
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Scott W
      • Re: RAW vs JPG?, Chris Hills
• Re: Second curtain flash, Colin_D
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Second curtain flash, Steve Carpenter
    • Re: Second curtain flash, Paul Furman
• Re: printer, Mark S. (UK)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: printer, David Azose
  • Re: printer, Mike Dobony
  • Re: printer, Zeppo
  • Re: printer, Zeppo
    • Re: printer, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: printer, Chris Hills
      • Re: printer, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: printer, DBLEXPOSURE
    • Re: printer, ray

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Alt  > alt.photography  > 2007-12