Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- From: "Mr. Strat" <rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:02:20 -0800
In article <pan.2007.12.15.20.30.31.808164@xxxxxxxxxx>, ray
<ray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fine - but I'm not a 'pro'. And I think most of the picture taking public
are not 'pros' either. For many of us, film still has a place.
The days of silver are definitely numbered. I mourn the passing of
Kodak's fine B&W products, but also understand the economics of staying
in business.
.
- References:
- question 35 mm vs digital
- From: Duke Of Earl
- Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- From: Marvin
- Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- From: ray
- Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- From: ray
- question 35 mm vs digital
- Prev by Date: Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- Next by Date: Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- Previous by thread: Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- Next by thread: Re: question 35 mm vs digital
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|