Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- From: Richard Polhill <richard.news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:50:38 +0100
Joel wrote:
dj_nme <dj_nme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you have some problem with picture other trying to show you, or
there is some disconnection between you and the real world ????
Why not post in a language you can use, Joel? Give up on English, it doesn't suit you.
Take "problem with picture other trying to show you"! I mean, can anybody translate?
No, just like most people in the world you may not see anyone carrying a
microscope to see some painting in much small detail. But I bet
- Many people may have a chance to see on TV
- Most people may have the idea of the collectors who use microscope to exam
their collection, and you may have seen model photographer using magnifier
to see smaller detail.
....who use _a_ microsope...
....to exam_ine_
....have seen _a_ model photographer...
...._a_ magnifier...
And what the heck I am talking about? well, I am trying to say that we
have to reach to some level to be able to see the real meaning of what other
seeing. I have never use microscope to exam my photo, painting (except
zooming) so I have no idea what they looking at.
Joel, if you stop dropping all the articles out of your sentences, other people may have some chance of understanding.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_%28grammar%29
Rich
.
- References:
- Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- From: Dan
- Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- From: dj_nme
- Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- From: Frank Arthur
- Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- From: dj_nme
- Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- Prev by Date: Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- Next by Date: Re: A couple of newbie questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- Next by thread: Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
- Index(es):