Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Robert Coe <bob@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:47:06 -0400
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:56:57 GMT, "Joe" <NoMail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
: "Nik Coughlin" <nrkn.com@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: news:etpk1v$r35$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
: > Joe wrote:
: >> I notice red-eye in many shots I take of other folk, but never in any
: >> photos of myself. Does this lack of red-eye mean that I have "bad"
: >> eyes? In photos, my eyes always look "dull" and the blue colour is
: >> mostly "greyish" these days. The pupil remains dark in all my photos
: >> no matter how powerful the flash or it's proximity to me. I can't
: >> even force it to appear.
: >
: > No. You are a mutant. I recommend joining the X-Men. H2H.
: >
:
: Na, I come from planet Earth. Still, that X-Men theory is intruiging!
: (Is that how you spell it? Ever typed a word, then looked at it for too long
: and it looked wrong!).
Yess.
.
- References:
- Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Joe
- Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Nik Coughlin
- Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Joe
- Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Prev by Date: Very nice resource
- Next by Date: Re: Nikon D80
- Previous by thread: Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Next by thread: Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Index(es):