Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:00:46 +0000
"Joe" <NoMail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"Nik Coughlin" <nrkn.com@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:etpk1v$r35$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Joe wrote:
I notice red-eye in many shots I take of other folk, but never in any
photos of myself. Does this lack of red-eye mean that I have "bad"
eyes? In photos, my eyes always look "dull" and the blue colour is
mostly "greyish" these days. The pupil remains dark in all my photos
no matter how powerful the flash or it's proximity to me. I can't
even force it to appear.
No. You are a mutant. I recommend joining the X-Men. H2H.
Na, I come from planet Earth. Still, that X-Men theory is intruiging!
(Is that how you spell it? Ever typed a word, then looked at it for
too long and it looked wrong!).
Many times. I find the phenomenon quite intriguing.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Joe
- Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- References:
- Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Joe
- Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Nik Coughlin
- Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- From: Joe
- Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Next by Date: Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Next by thread: Re: Does no red-eye mean bad eyesight?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|