Re: End of the road (long, advice needed)





I've had an old-school 35mm Canon EOS Rebel S for ages. And I really
do mean ages - it must be in the range 10-15 years. It's been on a LOT
of holidays with me. I use a couple of lenses - 35-80mm and 80-200mm.
I've been using Ilford HP5 black & white film for the last couple of
years and have taken some great photos. I absolutely love the camera.

I don't use it very often - I probably get through 6-8 films per year.
I take in on holidays and also pull it out on random occasions to take
a few pictures. The films are a bit expensive to develop (£14 or so
per roll) but I've always thought it was worth it because of the
quality of the pictures.

So that's the background - now to the tale of woe. It's broken! I
just got two films developed and they came back completely overexposed.
The films were developed correctly (they've both got the B&W pattern
down the edge of the negatives) so the problem must be with the camera
rather than the developer. Interestingly there were a few photos on
the last film I had developed which looked a bit odd - almost as though
the mirror or the flash were out of sync. I didn't worry too much at
the time but it now looks like that was the beginning of the end for my
beloved toy.

I guess I have three options, and I was looking for advice from this
group about which one is the best:
1. I could try and get it fixed. I have no idea where to go for this,
and since I can get a replacement 35mm SLR body for next to nothing
these days I suspect it's not worth even trying.
2. Get a new Canon SLR body (digital or 35mm). Not sure if it's still
possible to get new 35mm ones.
3. Get an SLR body (digital or 35mm) by a different manufacturer and
sell the Canon lenses.

I like 35mm, but I recognise that it's getting (a) more difficult and
(b) more expensive to develop my films. Also digital means that I get
instant output. But what about battery life? Do I have to start
hauling around battery rechargers when I go away? I think if I'm
honest I'm starting to think that it might be time to switch to
digital, but I'm a little sad about it.

I guess that this long and rambling post boils down to three questions:
1. Is this the right time to switch from 35mm to digital?
2. Is the picture quality that I'll get from a digital SLR going to be
good enough to make me happy when I'm used to 35mm?
3. Which digital SLRs are good? I want something that will take great
pictures and last me a good few years. Also, decent battery life is a
big advantage. Given my lenses the obvious option for me is the 350D
body. Or should I shy away from Canon completely?

Sorry for the length of the post - thanks a lot for any advice!

Darth.



If you like black and white then stick to film, digital doesn't have the
same look, feel or light rendition of film.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: End of the road (long, advice needed)
    ... I don't use it very often - I probably get through 6-8 films per year. ... quality of the pictures. ... rather than the developer. ... Get a new Canon SLR body. ...
    (alt.photography)
  • End of the road (long, advice needed)
    ... I've had an old-school 35mm Canon EOS Rebel S for ages. ... I don't use it very often - I probably get through 6-8 films per year. ... rather than the developer. ... Get a new Canon SLR body. ...
    (alt.photography)
  • a lot of sound harms are british and other eager keyboards are aggressive, but will Aziz twist that
    ... The bishop in accordance with the influential ... Every overall developer or margin, ... They am manipulate up distinct short films. ... violences under the global choir were resting below the considerable ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: chemicals for infrequent use
    ... I have 8x10 and 11x14 trays but I didn't keep my old chemical bottles, ... Regarding Xtol shelf life, I use the second method described on this ... As paper developer, I use Agfa Neutol NE ... I do not use the same stop bath/fixer/washaid for films and papers. ...
    (rec.photo.darkroom)
  • Re: OT: Scanning Transparencies
    ... The low speed films of the day could capture much detail. ... unless your father had a very expensive camera. ... The best had impressive front lenses. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)