Re: underwater photography
- From: "Stewart" <twoduncans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:07:30 +0100
I have tried both and would recommend a proper water proof camera. I found
in the housings I had (both for cine and still) that the controls were quite
fiddly. For the stills I bought a Nikonoss and is was superb.
"Jimbo" <jimkernicky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153322721.826624.316610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Which is the better way to go:
1. buy an underwater housing for the camera I already have (Canon A2
35mm)
- or -
2. buy a water proof camera?
I'm not looking for the greatest capabilities - I primarily shoot on
the ground and will continue to do so - but I would like to have the
ability to get some water shots. I'm not looking to spend 100's of
dollars - just looking at it like a hobby of sorts - If I get into it
then maybe in a few years I'll spend a $1000 or more on a
housing/camera, but right now I do not want to spend more than $300 -
I'd prefer a solution cheaper than that. Is this even possible given
the $ constraint?
Thanks,
Jim
.
- References:
- underwater photography
- From: Jimbo
- underwater photography
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about spiders
- Next by Date: problems with d1 and sb80dx/several af lenses
- Previous by thread: Re: underwater photography
- Next by thread: Re: underwater photography
- Index(es):