Re: getting into photography
- From: Randall Ainsworth <rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:00:57 -0800
In article <1140621677.511971.62590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Mr.Bolshoyhuy <bolshoyhuy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
at my cousins wedding, I got the same or better photos with my digital
P&S than the pro did with his Canon DSLR.
I have found that a single photog simply cant cover all the action in
the room. Candid shots taken by guests were added to the official
photos which were staged.
The groom and bride aint models; no need to force them to pose.
You've gotta get the formals or you're just jacking off.
Also, I hate indoor lighting. Outdoors in the sun is the best way to
have a wedding.
Indoor lighting, done properly, is fine. One does not always have the
luxury of outdoor settings.
.
- References:
- getting into photography
- From: Sandra Laberge
- Re: getting into photography
- From: Mr.Bolshoyhuy
- getting into photography
- Prev by Date: Re: all-digital prosumer, but thinking about freelancing.
- Next by Date: Circular Polarizer Filters
- Previous by thread: Re: getting into photography
- Next by thread: 2000 Photos
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|