Re: Mini Lab Photo Quality Pictures at Home


"Randall Ainsworth" <rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:130920050525519204%rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <W5edndpejsx-37veRVn-hw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, DBLEXPOSURE
> <celstuff@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Do yourself a favor and have your news browser ignore that obnoxious
>> ass. He knows little and has never produced a useful comment nor a photo
>> anyone would care to look at. He is probably still shooting for his high
>> school news paper and he thinks that makes him God's gift to photography.
>> Use your ignore list.
>
> I've probably forgotten more than you know about photography.


Oh, so the memory retention problem is the reason for your numerous acidic
replies to people who are trying to learn and get advice.. I see...

By the way, the quality of inkjet photo printing is going up while the cost
is going down. The consumer can print at home and if he uses the right
paper can blow a minilab out of the water. 5x7 and 8X10 is no problem. Went
to a gallery show a few weeks ago, there where several large format inkjets
prints. I would defy you to tell the difference.





.