Re: Switching to a Canon digital SLR



Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:44:37, Peter Guest <plg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:52:54 GMT, Unspam wrote:
>
>>Don't forget the cropping factor of 1.6 I believe
>
>Sorry .... please explain

Your lenses will "behave somewhat differently" on a 350D, their
"angles of view [of the lenses] has shifted UP towards the telephoto
end." as stated in

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/dslr-mag.shtml

"OK, firstly, when you put a 300mm lens on a D60 you do NOT get a
480mm lens ? it is still a 300mm lens. What has changed is the
format of the camera ? from 36x24mm film to a 22.7x15mm chip."

This smaller-than-film (CCD/CMOS) sensor chip is giving your lenses
(effectively) a smaller picture angle (referring to (Nikon has a
1.5x factor, Canon 1.6x - it's measured diagonally (see below))
http://www.nikon-image.com/eng/Nikkor_Lenses/af_spec.pdf) - due to
the fact that the film frame and the digital sensor have different
sizes. And when some of the light circle projected from a full-frame
EF lens falls outside the sensor, you get the crop - i.e. only a
part of the full frame!

If you look at the figures over at (Nick Rains has this covered,
too) http://www.digitalmagasinet.dk/show.asp?ID=577 , it's easy to
see that Canon can (or should want to!) make (smaller) lenses to fit
the smaller sensor size (EF-S) using much the same lens designs and
maybe improved glass for the smaller circle of confusion.

So... what was a "normal" lens before (50mm) is now a short
telephoto, and a wide-angle lens of 28-30-35mm (too bad the Sigma
300 f/1.4 is only available in Canon mount at the moment...) is the
new 'normal'.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: To all 4/3 detractors
    ... It's the total area of the sensor that matters, because it determines the pixel size. ... If you want a truly pocketable camera without losing DSLR image quality the E-420 should be right at the top of your shortlist...an awful lot of camera for your money. ... For example, a 35mm equivalent 16-35mm lens for a Canon 1.6x cropped sensor is about $650, and it's a very high quality lens. ... Any savings on the body is more than lost in the higher cost lenses. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Nikon and Megapixels
    ... If you take a photo with a 50 million pixel sensor using a milk bottle bottom for a lense you get a huge file of a crap low res image. ... In effect, what the formula says is that no matter how good the lens, ... But when the lens performance lags so far behind the sensor already as most zooms, all lenses at f16 etc do then theres not much if any actual image improvement by improving the sensor further! ... You CANNOT increase thew resolution from a lens by having a bigger pixel count. ...
    (alt.photography)
  • Re: Best Camera for NIght Shots?
    ... don't forget to compare available zoom lens ranges ... with available f/stops for those lenses. ... ISO with a larger sensor. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Canon 50D 5D
    ... Nikon has some, ... Those cameras require much better lenses than does the ... And there is no such thing as a "digital" lens. ... perpendicular to the plane of the sensor as possible to avoid optical ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Question about lens F-rating on digital slr
    ... putting a full frame lens on a 1.6 crop digital can ... - lenses that don't fill out full frame, ... magically become good on a crop sensor. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)