Re: Raw files are a waste of time



When I zoom in to Nikon D70 JPEGs, I can see
the 8 by 8 squares that JPEG uses for compression.
The only way to get really good quality with
the D70 is to use NEF+JPEG and discard the JPEG
after you've decided you like the shot.

John_B wrote:
> I agree!
> I take photo in jpeg only and they come
> out as good as film or slides ever did!
> But then again I don't have to always be
> correcting my photo errors either. The
> jpegs from a 6.3mg camera (Canon 10D)
> print excellent at 13" x 19" and can be
> looked at from 1 inch and its still a
> photo!
>
> Unspam, good for you now you can claim
> you took the photo as a photographer,
> not you made the photo ok as a graphic
> designer.
>
> "Unspam" <unspam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message
> news:BEF3859B.1B502%unspam@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > I have concluded that RAW files are a
> great way to kill time, a bit like
> > using a hair dryer to make toast. I
> used to set my camera to simultaneously
> > create RAW and JPG files but I think
> that using RAW too much like using a
> > safety net and have since switched to
> JPG only. This has saved me massive
> > amounts of time in post production
> because the files are mostly ready to
> > print.
> >
> > I endeavour to make correct exposures
> and check the histogram as I go along
> > but the biggest improvement that I
> have made is in setting the white
> balance
> > from scene to scene, I'm interested in
> nice warm skin tones and this method
> > produces results because it is very
> accurate in all lighting conditions. I
> > also had problems with my flashgun, a
> Canon 580ex, I hate the way it adjusts
> > exposures according to what (tone) I
> am focussing on (ETTL), dark tones =
> > overexposed, light tones =
> underexposed, so now I have the flash
> set to
> > manual (1/8th to 1/32nd power, bounced
> mainly) and don't need to worry about
> > that because the flash always throws
> out the same amount of light and I
> > adjust the aperture accordingly. I
> wish someone had told me this months
> ago,
> > I could have had a nice rest.
> >
>
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

.



Relevant Pages

  • Microsoft HD Photo Plug-ins for Photoshop are Released
    ... "HD Photo has been announced by Microsoft and the Joint Photographic ... Experts Group to be under consideration for a JPEG standard, ... officially released for both Windows and OSX. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: No pictures in folder
    ... the JPG extensions in my photo gallery to JPEG. ... I am using Vista, and I can see my photos just fine in photo gallery, paint ... and media player. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
  • Re: Detecting If a Photo Has Been Edited -- How?
    ... What about if the modified timestamp on a JPEG was significantly later than ... the time the photo was taken? ... > It you read the rules for this photo contest website you will see they ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: [Discussion] Sign Prediction for DCT coefficients
    ... full potential in the original JPEG standard. ... interlacing). ... and, the decoder looks at the image, and if it is not what it expects, it ... Media Photo" campaign - they have done something like that in their ...
    (comp.compression)
  • Re: Selections and Masks -- Part I Article
    ... I am actually reading the "Posterization" article, ... mention that RAW has 16 times more tones than JPEG, ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)

Loading