Re: Micoshaft recommends Linux
- From: Conor <conor_turton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:32:06 +0100
In article <gvh635$j5l$00$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Köhlmann says...
bcoombes wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:drive
On Tue, 26 May 2009 13:48:34 +0100http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1038568/ubuntu-eats-lappy-hard-
Conor <conor_turton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <pIQSl.43864$0S.5721@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt says...
You've never compared NTFS on Windows to ext3 on Linux. Windows fileAt least it doesn't kill hard drives...
access is ridiculously slow.
Are you saying ext3 does? Where did you hear that, I haven't?
Typical wintroll idiocy and dishonesty noted
/quote
The problem appears to be the default values set by the hard drive makers..
Voleware ignores the default values and just runs its own, however it
seems that Ubuntu made the grave mistake of doing what the hard drive
manufacturers told them.
/unquote
So the disks were at fault, and this is suddenly a "problem" of linux?
It wasn't just Ubuntu. All versions of Windows had no problems and the
drives complied with the specifications.
--
Conor
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
.
- Prev by Date: Re: ACPI Driver
- Next by Date: Re: ACPI Driver
- Previous by thread: Re: xp.pesto
- Next by thread: Intel processors - What do these ratings represent?
- Index(es):