Re: Digital Camera Memory

Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx>, the dribbling skid-row bum and
tree-hugging arse-bender who likes adventurous lewd infusions with
quolls, and whose partner is a hot-box with a malignant boogina, wrote
in <4gj1fkF1nas1kU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx>, the derelict vagrant and
thin-skinned soapy who likes animalistic pearl necklaces with
reindeers, and whose partner is a working girl with unhappy skunk
guts, wrote in <4gj08jF1nf32nU4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Gazwad wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Gazwad wrote:

What's the fucking point of any of this if the wife bitch has
already taken
the fucking camera?
How does the stupid *** expect to connect to the fucking thing
if he no longer has it? Let alone run multiple passes of a
multiple pass secure delete program.

Stupid fucking wanker.

The OP said he had other cameras. He must have a collection of
compromising pictures.

My advice to him then is to smash them all with a big fucking
hammer. He can then let the wife have them as part of the divorce
settlement.

My ex wife ripped up a load of pictures of an ex girlfriend, for
no other reason than jealousy.
I likewise ripped up all her pictures of her family and friends,
for no other reason than I'm a ***.

Forgive me. I'm still trying to understand the issue.

Oh, so you did take a look after all.

Women are like cats. We have to look.

Ok, I can understand Gaz wanting to refer to the incident using
metaphor but what about the horse ***?

First of all, had there been an "incident" as you call it....<sputters>

<crosses arms, crosses legs, glares>

You do realize what this means, don't you?

(Besides, I'd have drawn a lot more than blood.)

rl

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Insisting on perfect safety is for people
without the balls to live in the real world.
Mary Shafer Iliff


.

Quantcast