Re: USB speed on old mobo?

In
dowdy-drifter@thou-coward-thou-grease-covered-pribbling-old-pantaloon">news:dowdy-drifter@thou-coward-thou-grease-covered-pribbling-old-pantaloon,
Banned Apache
<alt.books.bemused.blonde.lady-for-hire@delicate-***'s-crib.co.jp> typed:
SleeperMan <SleeperMan@xxxxxxxxxx>, the farting-ne'er-do-well and
queasy tante who likes unspeakable ear sex with grizzly bears, and
whose
partner is a hedge whore with a soaking bone polisher, wrote in
<xU%4g.2259$oj5.820388@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In news:z84ftg$wuo$o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Kadaitcha Man <***-you.ya.***@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
SleeperMan <SleeperMan@xxxxxxxxxx>, the horizontally enhanced
capper, proscribed:

In news:wf02b8$n3i$x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Kadaitcha Man <***-you.ya.***@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
SleeperMan <SleeperMan@xxxxxxxxxx>, the overdelicate herald,
tehee'd:

In
cadaverous-drifter@thou-huge-bombard-of-sack-thou-infectious-currish-so-dissolute-a-crew">news:cadaverous-drifter@thou-huge-bombard-of-sack-thou-infectious-currish-so-dissolute-a-crew,
Banned Apache <rec.arts.ratty.yayas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
typed:
SleeperMan <SleeperMan@xxxxxxxxxx>, the boring-bag-man and pudgy
pile-driver who likes ravenous nad chewing with moray eels, and
whose partner is a piece-of-ass with a swollen cradle of filth,
wrote in <s1I4g.2211$oj5.813249@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I just made some tests...
i have (old) Soyo Dragon plus K7V board (fsb133) and on-board
USB 1.1 and additional USB 2.0 IDE board. Now, when i put in
my new Transcend JF150 1G USB2.0 key into PC - could it be
download
from key so much faster than upload to key? For example, when
having key in USB 2.0 board, FROM key is about 10000 kb/sec,
while TO key speed is only about 170 kb/sec, HOWEVER, when i
put key into mobo USB1.1 slot, speed FROM key is veeery slow
(like 80 kb/sec) , while speed TO key is actually faster than
one in USB 2.0 slot - some 340 kb/sec... how can these
differences be?? i tried some different drivers - the one which
installs automatically from XP (standard enchanced PCI to USB
host controller) is the slowest one, while other two (NEC USB
2.0 controller and USB 2.0 Enchanced host controller) are
faster, but only up to what i wrote above. speed FROM key is
same no matter which driver i use, only speed TO key differs.
maybe i wrote too complicated---? but i'd like some
explanations, or suggestions. Luckily i mostly
download( from my Canon S2 digital camera), but now i'll also
upload to my new key and some speed would be nice...

Did you replace that shitty old USB2 (fast) card with a new
(full speed) card as suggested?

I wouldn't be surprised if crappy hardware from slope cunts in
hong kong causes problems like you describe.

i wonder what's maximum bandwidth of those old mobo's...if they
can transfer that high speed data at all...if they can, then
shitty usb card would be a solution, since it was cheap. So, you
suggest it's one of those "USB 2.0 hi-speed compatible" chinacrap
?

It's either that or an ID 10 T error.

uff...now you got me....i must look up for that meaning :-)

Remove the spaces :)


yep...done that...it's not an error i've got :-)))
and i still get too low speed when uploading to my new usb :-((

I have replaced a few motherboards recently, I've been using ASROCK.
They are cheap and pretty good quality from what I've seen.
Dump that AMD shyte and get a Pentium 4 and an ASROCK P4VM800
motherboard. They have 6 USB2 ports plus provision for an extra 2 on
the front, they also have built-in everything else you may want. They
cost ***-all too.

hm... first of all, at time of my purchase amd was far better that intel and
far cheaper. These days amd is still far cheaper and still at least equal
than intel. AMD was first who made 64 bit CPU...intel was light years behind
it.
I'll have to hear a lot of definite pluses for intel to decide to pay twice
for a cpu. mobo's with nforce chipset are very good, i hear...

--
Visit my web page at http://www.protoncek.com


.

Quantcast