Re: Pugsley


"G.T." <getnews1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11jojfhq0i912b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Shaun aRe" <shaun_are@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:433c0881$0$29585$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Ride-A-Lot" <mitchellNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:G82dnbc_7NNaD6feRVn-jQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > blubber***@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > I guess they're gonna see production....
> > > > Okay, who's going to be the first?
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2005/tech/shows/interbike05/?id=interbike0
> > 52/DSCN0127
> > > >
> > > > /s
> > > >
> > >
> > > Holy crap that thing has a lot of ground clearance. I would change
the
> > > name to Fugly, cause it is.
> >
> > Why is it ugly? WTF is WRONG with fat tyres?!?
> >
>
> Well, there is fat and then there is obese. I find that they ruin the
> classical aesthetics of a 2.4" tire on a 26" rim.
>
> Greg

That's just plainly and simply plain and simple prejudice. You can go to
hell for prejudice you know.






Shaun aRe


.

Quantcast