Re: Pugsley
- From: "G.T." <getnews1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:26:23 -0700
"Shaun aRe" <shaun_are@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:433c0881$0$29585$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Ride-A-Lot" <mitchellNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:G82dnbc_7NNaD6feRVn-jQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > blubber***@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > I guess they're gonna see production....
> > > Okay, who's going to be the first?
> > >
> > >
>
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2005/tech/shows/interbike05/?id=interbike0
> 52/DSCN0127
> > >
> > > /s
> > >
> >
> > Holy crap that thing has a lot of ground clearance. I would change the
> > name to Fugly, cause it is.
>
> Why is it ugly? WTF is WRONG with fat tyres?!?
>
Well, there is fat and then there is obese. I find that they ruin the
classical aesthetics of a 2.4" tire on a 26" rim.
Greg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pugsley
- From: Shaun aRe
- Re: Pugsley
- From: Slack
- Re: Pugsley
- References:
- Pugsley
- From: blubber***
- Re: Pugsley
- From: Ride-A-Lot
- Re: Pugsley
- From: Shaun aRe
- Pugsley
- Prev by Date: Re: Phlat Chance
- Next by Date: Re: RR another biker born
- Previous by thread: Re: Pugsley
- Next by thread: Re: Pugsley
- Index(es):