ETA: Does it really save any energy?



Marzocchi's ETA feature lets the rider lower a 100mm fork by about an inch and
reduce the travel to an inch.

I'm not sure whether the claimed benefit is change in bike attitude, less energy
absorbed by bobbing, or both.


But thinking about the bogging aspect, it seems like it might be a matter of
longer travel through less resistance vs shorter travel through greater
resistance. If that's true maybe the energy absorbed is a wash.

Anybody?
--
PeteCresswell
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Does it really save any energy?
    ... > Marzocchi's ETA feature lets the rider lower a 100mm fork by about an inch ... > reduce the travel to an inch. ... > longer travel through less resistance vs shorter travel through greater ...
    (alt.mountain-bike)
  • Re: trav-a-dial accuracy
    ... so I know about the curvature on the wheel for calibrating it, ... Using my Chineese made 2 inch dial indicator the closest I can get it ... short on the 2 inch travel. ... GREATER since it's effectivly making the wheel smaller. ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: Does it really save any energy?
    ... >> Marzocchi's ETA feature lets the rider lower a 100mm fork by about an ... >> inch and reduce the travel to an inch. ... >> through greater resistance. ...
    (alt.mountain-bike)
  • Re: Does it really save any energy?
    ... > Marzocchi's ETA feature lets the rider lower a 100mm fork by about an ... > inch and reduce the travel to an inch. ... > matter of longer travel through less resistance vs shorter travel ...
    (alt.mountain-bike)
  • Re: Hi-hat pedal travel
    ... I sat down at some of the kits they'd set up. ... short pedal travel; probably well less than an inch. ... two cymbals can barely come completely apart... ...
    (rec.music.makers.percussion)