Re: control bitch hyperbole

and on the same note, why would you get up from the bar, walk across the
street to another bar, sit down and start yelling about the person you just
sitting next to?? is that the way to make friends and influence people?? i
know i would be moving real quick to get away from that negativity in a
bar... who wants to be subjected to rantings and ravings that have no
bearing on them... they don't care what the guy at the other bar said., and
they sure don't want to hear it over and over again.

--
lampy

"Cindy in Pa" <cleighnospam1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Y8SdnbpKGZV8krTbnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I guess it depends on if you like having the last word :-)

No...I understand your point...but I think this latest round is Nanny
stating her opinion that she does not want to share space with cb and the
no
named ones jumped on her thread and it went to hell in a hand basket.

I think I have been pretty straight forward in my opinions on the subject
and have long ago quit kicking this dead horse...

I just hate to see Nanny closing doors so firmly and
relationships/friendships of years being ruined over a difference in
opinion
that is being skewed by the no named ones.

Cindy in Pa


"lightlady" <llamd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:58sgquF2i04thU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
your sitting at a bar ... someone sits next to you, they say something
you
don't like. just how long do you sit there and argue with them???
neither
one is going to change their minds, so *just How Long* will you stay and
argue on a topic you find distasteful??? how long does it take you to
finally just get up from the bar and walk away?? oh and this is a
"Public
Bar" so there are no bouncers to thrwo either of you out.

how long do you stay and argue?

--
lampy

"Cindy in Pa" <cleighnospam1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4aOdnVllTt_1Y7XbnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was gonna try and stay out of this one because the last fray on this
subject was just as out of control as this thread...but this post is
one
I
appreciate...someone who finally says..."it aint your life I am
supporting
cb"

I do not agree with everything Nanny has written on this topic...but I
believe she has a right to her opinion even if I don't agree...and that
she
has a right to voice it without being attacked.

My problem with cb has been from day one that he bullies many on this
group...he wants to have it both ways...he wants to share stories about
his
life & life style but then you can only comment if you agree...if you
dare
disagree or voice your opinion on the subject he is liable to call you
some
of the crudest names or wish on you some of the worst abuses
possible...and
the silence of the majority while he is doing these things makes it
look
like you condone his treatment of others.

People form opinions their whole life through...some reasonable, some
unreasonable, some based on facts or truths...some just because they
feel
them. I think this is one of those issues...the opinions that some have
on
this subject are not shared by the group as a whole...while some may
see
Nanny's post as trying to make you see it her way or no way...I would
rather
give her the benefit of the doubt and say she was just giving us her
opinion.

I have to say that Ed lost all credibility with me in his garden group
so
the crap he wrote is a non issue for me and most likely just something
to
fan the flames...he lives for it. He most likely included Nanny in one
or
more of his rants...that's his mo...I would hope that you wouldn't blow
Nanny off because he used her name to validate his garbage...

Cindy in Pa


"Rosemarie Shiver" <post147@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:58s6bjF2htt71U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Honestly, CB,

I don't think it's as much supporting your life as being anti-Ed.
He
literally called for Darfur-like conditions to rain down upon our
families.
'Extremism' as Paul puts it, is just too mild a word for what
"Cripple"
is
calling for. No one who is really crippled and understands pain would
ask
to
see a Darfur-like situation visited on tiny toddlers. Ed seems to
take
glee
in it...and since Nanny chooses not to repudiate this I can no longer
be
a
friend to her, because she thinks what Ed says is OK with her.

Vicious, vile vitriol. Pure evil. And evil in the service of a
so-called
good makes the good evil as well. The end does not and never will
justify
the means.

I've seen lots of things on the 'Net. I've even glanced at a lotta
the
vileness that Jite has inflicted on many groups but not even he has
sunk
THIS low....and those who wallow in whale poop will have no support
from
me.

Sorry, it ain't you...it's THEM.

Hugs,
RosieS
Demented Dame




--
"If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." -- Meat
Loaf,
Bat
Outta Hell II
"Cheeky ***" <InvalidEmail@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TpWVh.11948$Kd3.4389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Awwww poor old prune lost support from Rosie. (Hope it hurts) LOL

If I am just so wrong as some *claim* than why are the most eldest
and
respected posters in here supporting me so much?

Hmmmm maybe because they know the real me and the real deal.

*Unlike* others who post this trash *nobody* has any back channel
Email
by
me asking for support.

If Lynn, Margo, Nancy, Rosie, Paul and others did not agree with my
lifestyle and choices and argued it as some of you do I would have
ignored
them long ago because we all need more than an "online" friend to
support
and make us happy.

Lastly some forget that we all have FMS but just because of FMS our
sex
life
no matter what age or orientation has not stopped as have others. I
think
the ones who yell the most are just sexually frustrated!

If I were straight and my relations were with a younger girl of
legal
age
I
bet some of you fundies would not say a thing.

I admire the women who have FMS and have told me (just like me) that
they
do
not give their mate as much as they should get because of painful
days.

Seems those of us who still have a sex life have others who are
jealous.

CB

"Rosemarie Shiver" <post147@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:58qapoF2iadklU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What I'm against is so-called Christians, Nanny. Those who
hate-monger.
WWJD? Not hate-monger, that's for true.

If you support the vile vitriol spewed by Ed you've lost me as a
supporter of yours, Nanny. No question about it. Yes, I will
indeed
wash
my
hands of you that fast...because I cannot and will not, in all
good
conscience, support such irrational hatred and anyone who endorses
it,
either.

FM'ly Hugs,
Rosie S.
Demented Dame



--
"If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." -- Meat
Loaf,
Bat
Outta Hell II
"nanny" <gloria006@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4627db6b$0$18871$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So, Rosie and lampy, what I see you saying is that your attacks
are
against
"Christians", and since I am one, specifically against me.
Rosie,
I
have
lost trust in you. You were at one time a person who always
encouraged
me
and helped me through many questions I had. But, I feel as if
you
now
want
to put me "out to pasture" because I don't fit in your box.
Nanny
"Rosemarie Shiver" <post147@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:58pqkmF2hds08U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gotta agree, Cuzzin',

Ya can't control what 16 year olds do sexually, regardless.
If
ya
try
to
you get DCP at the door threatening to take the parents to
court.
For
CHILD
ABUSE. Control? These days? Nope. Can't even get them to get a
high
school
diploma if they don't want to....so how ya gonna stop 'em from
having
sex?
Lock 'em up? Ban 'em from seeing the other person? And spank
'em
if
they
defy ya? Guess what...CHILD ABUSE allegations against the
parent
faster'n
you can say BOO. Ya know I went thru this with the second
oldest
girl
and
she turned out OK despite all the grief I got.

And all this vitriol spewed by a so-called
Christian....kinda
reminds
ya
of a so-called Christian who spewed similar words and also
bullets
to
go
with on Monday. Assassination...real or virtual....all the same
thing.

Their mothers must be SO PROUD.

Anyway you look at it, hate-mongering is hate-mongering.

But as we know, don't we...what goes around comes around, so
be
sure
to
duck when it flies by, ok? LOL

Luv and Hugs,
Rosie S.
Demented Dame



--
"If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." --
Meat
Loaf,
Bat
Outta Hell II
"lightlady" <llamd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:58phvjF2h3aobU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
oh, blow it out your ass... you are a very negtative person to
think
the
way
you do... if you can't be tolerant and turn the other cheek,
then
you
are
a
hippocrit!! may *your god* have mercy on you when the
judgement
time
comes... fake christianity and all that, really makes me glad
i
Left
That
Religion!! friggin hippocrits LOL do as i say, not as i
do!!!
is
that
your motto??? seems like it to me...

at least your signing your 'real' name now LOL but your addy
looks
like
you
were trying to spell vagina???? hmmm, fruedian slip there or
what!!!!

--
lampy


"Ed" <Saywhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ytLVh.23046$NK5.12102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Very good Michael.
The following needs to be said here and in any other threads
necessary





----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
------------

You are all a bunch of sick stupid people.
I can not wait for some queer to abuse, exploit or your son
or
grandson.
You will
cry the blues, and will not understand how such a person
could
have
done
something so disgusting to your children or grandbabies.
I and Nanny will feel for the well being of the children,
separately,
I
will
personally laugh at your pain. I will snicker about your
pain.
You will have no one to blame but yourselves. You had a
chance
to
take
a
stand against one child abuser
and when your family member is exploited some other person
will
think
that
they should not step up and take a stand
to help your child either.

You turn aside your eyes and do not want to condemn what CB
does
to
the
child named Frank. Not because you believe CB is guiltless,
but
because you are afraid of the abuse that he and the pig
SavviKKK
will
heap
upon you.

Frank is not the last child that CB will abuse. CB has just
tasted
juvenile
blood. Before he finishes with this child, he will have him
recruit
some
other child for him to abuse.

You are sitting by and watching a child being abused and
exploited
and
how
in GOD's Name do have
the nerve to condem the person pointing out that a child is
being
abused
and
damaged for life.

Frank's life is ruined. He'll never be the same..
His whole young life before him tarnished and violated in
the
worst
way.
Not only that, but CB thinks it is okay to brag about his
sexual
perverity
and escapades on
AMF for all to see. He called Nanny "too thin-skinned".
What
a
frivolous
and shallow statement.

This has nothing to do with homosexuality. This is CHILD
ABUSE.
Child
abuse and homosexuality is not the same. To take a stand
against
Child
Abuse, IS NOT anti homosexual.

Your God should have mercy on your souls. Mine sure won't

What GOD to you pray
to?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

This needs to be said again and again
This has nothing to do with homosexuality. This is CHILD
ABUSE.
This has nothing to do with homosexuality. This is CHILD
ABUSE.
This has nothing to do with homosexuality. This is CHILD
ABUSE.
This has nothing to do with homosexuality. This is CHILD
ABUSE.


"nanny" <gloria006@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4624e06e$0$27112$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In case there are any more doubts or accusations coming
from
Margo's
corner in particular, here's the real deal concerning this
whole
situation
and how I stand on it. Really very simple.

It is not unusual at all to NOT see eye-to-eye with people
on
an
unmoderated newsgroup. In fact, it's impossible.
BUT.....just
as
we
all
know, I have the same right as Margo and anyone else to
state
my
opinion,
even when that opinion is based on principle, alone.
Adding
OT
to
any
post that is not directly FM-related is the accepted way
of
doing
this.

My main issue with Dave (CB) was the word-by-word
descriptions
he
was
sharing about his young lover Frank. By doing so, and in
very
crude
and
suggestive language, he had no concern how it was
affecting
some
of
us
on
AMF. His rantings brought AMF to a whole new low! I read
all
the
explanations and excuses to validate CB's lifestyle, yes,
even
all
the
laws on book in every state as to "age of consent" that a
few
of
you
posted.

Doesn't matter to me. I was not attacking CB's
homosexuality.
I
was
stating that, in my opinion, which I have every right to
express,
the
line
was crossed. The young man Frank is the victim; CB is the
pedifile.
Willing or not, Frank is too young yet to have formed
mature
decisions
in
life or to calculate the damage done to him for the rest
of
his
life.
All
you mothers and grandmothers in cyber land - how would you
like
a
pedifile
messing with your son's or grandson's mind and body in
such
a
destructive
manner?

That's it. And, that's why I cannot co-exist with CB on
FM
Tenders.
CB
said I was too "thin-skinned" on this matter. Oh no, that
is
too
frivilous a statement. The dye was cast a long time ago.
My
personal
principle in this regard has been violated. Only the same
few
people
have
responded on this issue. I wonder what the other 600+
people
on
AMF
(as
stated by Michael) feel about pedifilia and its effect on
children
and
young adults. They may be too intimidated to be vocal, but
I
am
not!
Nanny




"Michael B" <baughfam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176977250.855340.99230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I share Nanny's concerns about the homosexual lifestyle,
and I applaud her forthrightness about expressing her
concerns.
If CB is going to wear his sexual proclivities as though
they
were
a coat of many colors, he presents himself and his choices
to
criticism. Sex and politics are probably topics best left
away
from
the dining room table and the keyboard. But CB has brought
the topic to the table in an aggressive fashion, and I am
rather
surprised that others have not come in on that, but maybe
it's
because they understand that it wouldn't change anything
anyway.
As do I. So this is not to invite the rather predictable
diatribes
from
Margo, who has 'Plonked" me anyway, but I doubt that it
will
last.
I'm just wanting to point out that here is someone that
thinks
that
Nanny's notions are legitimate, and that she, and I, and
any
others
need to not bother ourselves getting into pointless
discussions
with
Margo and CB.
Far as I'm concerned, 'nuff said.























.

Loading