Re: AN OPINION Re: Is Devin a real MD?



Paul T. Holland wrote:
just my two cents on the basic points that everyone has been making
here

cb, you posted a 'simple' question.
not complicated, no hidden agendas

THANK YOU VERY MUCH

[and all know that you can, when in the mood, be a terror!<vvvvvbg!>

Bigger grin........

it was just a question - was there an answer to 'the' question you
asked - nope

Not a 100% conclusive one that id 100% fact.


lots of info - from many - myself included - but not an answer.

TRUE.

in this early part of the thread, you have NOT gone 'off' - you have
NOT used the lack of an answer to foment discord

you have - equally simply - stated what caused you to ask, and as is
your RIGHT, reserved your opinion based upon the actual response
information given. or, as in this case, the lack of the specific
information you were looking for.

TRUE

you are not doing anything other than what each of us regards as our
right

to make up our minds, and make decisions, based upon the information
we have at any given time -

what is worth mentioning twice here is that you have NOT gone to any
extreme, just stuck to your basic tenant.

i may have a different conclusion based upon available info - and
that is nothing more than fodder for good discussion

what i really wish all could agree upon is that the asking is not the
same thing as a foregone conclusion - that is precisely why someone
may need to ask for clarifications of points or facts - because it is
not always self-evident.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH

here we have an issue that cannot, at this time, be resolved

there isn't - imo - any need for division - neither pole, nor any
position in between, can answer as an absolute and resolve the
question.

i read in the thread where strong words are being written, and only
wish that it were not so

they are - imo - based upon conclusions that are really supposition.

it was a simple premise - that has not been answered - what
school/when

THANK YOU VERY MUCH! Simple questions eh?

even if everyone of us disagrees with cb's needing/wanting that
particular answer - does it really make him wrong to hold out for it?

NOPE. This whole group ALWAYS jumps to conclusions and has no idea why I
want my answer.
They possibly think I am out to trash Devin.
Now the answer to the questions just might but I don't know until I have
them now do I?


unless i am totally incorrect, he wrote that he didn't want to back
either position until he was sure...

100% Correct!

So *I* would like to know the *exact* answer to my question because
that will *confirm* who is telling the truth.

I'm sorry but I am not the local news paper and like to know the
hard facts and truth before I speak.
I would hate to back Devin or the organization and then found out I
was repeating a lie.

It's black or white and grey will not do!

The question still stands!

he didn't say that he now holds there to be a lie - i find an implied
'if' in there...and that is a stance of neutrality. "before i speak"

THANK YOU VERY MUCH


yeah , i know he has now used the term witch hunt - look at the
context - imo - he was responding to the replies he is now getting

"Now if *all* of you think I am on a witch hunt *maybe* you are right
because I am!"

so he didn't start out with any 'tude, but he did let it slip in
there <another bg>

Well because this whole group thinks I am going to be the marter who killed
the saint.
After the accusations I got in reply I know hope the other person is right
and there is something hidden.
Then they can all wipe the egg off thier faces.

some had made pretty strong statements to cb because you thought he
was saying something that he had not

Keyword THOUGHT "wrong"

he then got on his horse and gave it back.

Of course Paul <vbg>

i totally understand the desire to not have any detrimental
statements be made about devin - and i agree. BUT i just don't see
that that is what cb has done.

Paul don't you see? In their minds if I proved Devin a fake and not the
other person that means Devin and all the others are bogus and I will be the
one to kill off all these peoples hopes. Hence the attacks on me for asking
Did she graduate?
And When and Where?
And did she have an actual MD license?

Why do you think I used the EXACT same topic from 1997?



as always - jmo

be well everyone

paul

CB

CHEEKY *** wrote:

Angel wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:03 GMT, "CHEEKY ***"
<NotARealEmailAddy@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Notice the reply never stated "Dr" Devin graduated in _________
from with

For heaven's sake, anyone who graduates from four years of med
school is an M.D. That's the name of the degree! To become a
practicing doctor requires an internship and residency. What
difference does it make? If you don't trust Devin's information
and advice, then don't use it.

Not trying to be a chit disturber here (anyone who's been around
a while knows me better than that), but you seem to want to argue
just for argument's sake. I certainly applaud you for checking
your sources before taking anyone's advice, but when in
doubt...don't. :-)


Angel
Siren of the Sea

Now as I was going to tell someone who Emailed me but haven't gotten
around to yet!
Now if *all* of you think I am on a witch hunt *maybe* you are right
because I am!

I want 100% confirmation to the question that has been asked before!

Why?

Because what was said to me was said by the leader of an
organization who is *supposed* to be an advocate group for *us*.
I searched the organization for post to see if this question has
come up before and came up empty.
I searched this question using Devin's name and the question came up
from years past.

So *I* would like to know the *exact* answer to my question because
that will *confirm* who is telling the truth.

I'm sorry but I am not the local news paper and like to know the
hard facts and truth before I speak.
I would hate to back Devin or the organization and then found out I
was repeating a lie.

It's black or white and grey will not do!

The question still stands!

CB


.

Loading