Re: Is it the buyer's responsibility to insure an item if they are returning it?
- From: googler <googlergoogler@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:34:38 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 8, 5:15�pm, "void.no.spam....@xxxxxxxxx"
<void.no.spam....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see from the Paypal Buyer Protection that it is the seller's
responsibility to ensure that an item gets to the buyer (i.e. they
should pay for insurance if the buyer doesn't want it). �Then what if
the buyer returns an item to the seller (at the buyer's expense), but
didn't pay for insurance, and the item gets lost? �What happens?
Insurance is for the protection of the shipper, always. The shipper
chooses the carrier, and the carrier is now a subcontractor to the
shipper as part of the overall transaction. The primary is responsible
for the performance of the sub. Simple.
All said, postal insurance is a useless expense, given the superb
record of postal performance. Really. They do lose things, but so very
rarely that insurance surely is a cash cow for them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Is it the buyer's responsibility to insure an item if they are returning it?
- From: void.no.spam.com@xxxxxxxxx
- Is it the buyer's responsibility to insure an item if they are returning it?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it the buyer's responsibility to insure an item if they are returning it?
- Next by Date: Re: My peeve: turning Priority Mail boxes inside out
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it the buyer's responsibility to insure an item if they are returning it?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it the buyer's responsibility to insure an item if they are returning it?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
