Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: jon_banquer <jon_banquer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Helpful post as I only have a casual interest and don't intend to make
much of an effort in this area anytime soon.
When I get some time I might look into it more. It's not a high
priority for me or for our shop and it's not part of what the company
I work for expects from me. With Mastercam X3 being released today on
the e-Mastercam forum and going into general release next week,
learning the new toolpaths in X3 and seeing if Feature Recognition in
X3 is something we can use, as well as possibly getting some advanced
4th and 5th axis training, is much more important.
Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: jon_banquer
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: brewertr
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: jon_banquer
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: zymrgy
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: brewertr
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: Joe788
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: Joe788
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- From: Cliff
- Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- Prev by Date: Re: CAM software
- Next by Date: Re: I say byebye
- Previous by thread: Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- Next by thread: Re: Better quality can be a bad thing....(long but important)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|