Re: Survey: Control Keyboard Preference



Cliff wrote:

On Mon, 21 May 2007 01:05:45 GMT, BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Cliff wrote:

On Sun, 20 May 2007 11:29:33 GMT, BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Your claims to have reformed him fell flat.

Cliff:

In other words your statement that *I* made a claim to have reformed
Jon was a totally bogus and unsupported fabrication on your part?

You worked on it a long time.

Cliff:

That wasn't the issue. YOU made a statement that I said something
which I didn't.

I recall the discusion(s).

Cliff:

You recall wrongly then.

THE issue here is your honesty, or lack thereof, as a result of YOU
claiming I said something which I didn't. There are roughly four
courses of action that can be taken when your claims are challenged:

A. Provide conclusive/indisputable evidence of your claims.

B. If there is no evidence to support a false claim, a person of
integrity would then admit that he made a mistake.

C. An unethical person may try to obfuscate the issue by injecting
various irrelevant points that have nothing to do with the central issue
of the false claim.

D. Another tactic of a deceitful individual is to attempt to ignore that
the whole situation happened.


This seems to be a common habit of yours.

Not going digging. You get the gist.

LMAO! You dig in google for hours to find some insignificant error so
you can jump up and down pointing your finger at your target of the
moment while screaming "You're WRONG, You're WRONG". So I'm to believe
you NEVER even bothered to search for ME saying that "I reformed him"?
Yeah RIGHT!

So what you're saying is that you're not going to even BOTHER to try
and support your false claim? Well let me just help you out here:

====================================================================
Google search: author bottlebob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and the word "reformed"
gets 11 hits. Not a single ONE of them was ME saying that I had
reformed Jon.

http://tinyurl.com/2xvyhf
=====================================================================

If someone can't be trusted to be honest in the small things, how can
they be trusted to be honest in the things that are important?

--
BottleBob
http://home.earthlink.net/~bottlbob
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to do this?
    ... are not more people saying it. ... want to post insults, then you're unlikely to get help. ... with the flu (nto too bad ... Jon Skeet - ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Concrete Documentation Suggestions
    ... "Example of something that will get removed: My name is Jon ... I might be new to all these SW blogs, but who is this Cliff and Jon i keep ... Cliff Huprich is Jon?s alter ego evil twin who follows Jon around and harrasses ... useless because of the high percentage of off-topic posts. ...
    (comp.cad.solidworks)
  • Re: Palin On Darwin
    ... Cliff wrote: ... Elsewhere in this volume she talks about creationism, saying she ... in the theory that human beings - thinking, loving beings - originated ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: Palin On Darwin
    ... Cliff wrote: ... Elsewhere in this volume she talks about creationism, saying she ?didn?t believe ... thinking, loving beings? ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: Damn you, FEDEX! or Nikon D40 lost in Springfield, MO blackhole.
    ... the 2 mp Mavica he had been using with a Nikon D40. ... After shopping around, he got me to order one for him. ... The shipper had it insured, but from what I have read it could take weeks to sort this crap out. ... You may get your insurance from FedEx and a couple weeks later they find it and deliver it. ...
    (alt.photography)