Re: G41, some Qs
- From: brewertr@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:44:27 -0700
On Fri, 11 May 2007 03:55:38 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 15:16:49 -0700, brewertr@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 17:39:04 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 09:26:19 -0700, brewertr@xxxxxxx wrote:
as opposed to your unnecessarily
difficult and error prone method,
Such as CAD/CAM systems ...
No that would be your C-CRAP method, you know, when you see crap you
know Cliff did it.
You used second quadrant (to save on all those
minus signs & keep it simple, right?) so I used another <G>.
We used the ONLY quadrant the Original Posters Machine HAS.
No matter what quadrant you "SAY" you programmed for you STILL made
NUMERIOUS ERRORS in those two lines of code you posted.
One of these days I may get bored & dig out your
posts & do a statement by statement commentary
on selected claims of yours <GG>.
Already done, you mean you want to start over and use your
"Cliffvised" versions of what people posted rather than actual quotes.
Your off in la la land somewhere Cliff, Check your med's.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Need For New Kinds Of Direct Geometry Editing Tools
- Next by Date: Re: cnc for woodworking
- Previous by thread: Re: G41, some Qs
- Next by thread: Re: G41, some Qs