Re: G41, some Qs
- From: Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 17:39:04 -0400
On Sun, 06 May 2007 09:26:19 -0700, brewertr@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 07:48:06 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 05 May 2007 19:48:29 -0700, brewertr@xxxxxxx wrote:
Thought question was about tool diameter/radius comp ... but
even then I don't recall if PV is using WSP or centerline programming ....
Still Clueless-Cliff I see. Doesn't matter what programming method is
used, WSP or Centerline Programming as John stated: the "Comp distance
should always be greater than the value in the comp register".
Note the "comp in on both X & Y".
Yep, and your still Clueless-Cliff, rule still applies.
Your ignorance of CNC programming is showing.
Tool radius/diameter cutter comp is at right angles to the toolpath.
So your saying cutter comp doesn't work with radius, curves or on
oblique angles?
"At right angles to the toolpath".
Don't confuse it with X or Y axis comps of various sorts.
The only thing confusing is you thinking you know ANYTHING about CNC
Programming.
"Note the "comp in on both X & Y"."
You already had so many "worst practices" <VBG>.
Like my making good g-code and parts,
Have you spotted your problems yet?
as opposed to your unnecessarily
difficult and error prone method,
Such as CAD/CAM systems ...
--
Cliff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: brewertr
- Re: G41, some Qs
- References:
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: Cliff
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: brewertr
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: Cliff
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: brewertr
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: Cliff
- Re: G41, some Qs
- From: brewertr
- Re: G41, some Qs
- Prev by Date: Re: Practical Machinist Posts
- Next by Date: Re: Grammatical Summary Of: "5 Axis Machine" OR "5 Axes Machine"
- Previous by thread: Re: G41, some Qs
- Next by thread: Re: G41, some Qs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|