Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff <Clhuprich@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:08:04 -0400
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:33:55 GMT, BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Found that peck of "inertia" yet?
Tell us again what it's supposed to be per the lint ...
I VERY CLEARLY wrote:
[
Be clear, concise & *use your own words*.
Feel free to set some equations before us that show your claimed effect ..
BTW, Why is Newton's "First Law" about motion (and not pecks)?
]
======================================================================
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/08/15/14.html
Inertia is not measured directly;
If you cannot measure it how can you (or the lint) claim that it exists?
it is not said that a body has so many
units of inertia.
No pecks, eh? Giving up?
We do say that a body has mass,
Mass is mass.
and mass is the
quantitative measure of the amount of inertia the body has; thus, mass
measures inertia.
Mass is mass. It "measures" nothing but has measure.
Inertia is that property of mass that resists (or
opposes) change in a motion state.
We have conservation laws that cover all of that sort of thing.
Did the nuns toss them out?
BTW, IF you had such you could measure it, right? LOL ....
======================================================================
======================================================================
http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/physics/force/node3.html
Definition: Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist any attempt
to change its state of motion. Mass is the force required per unit of
acceleration produced and is a measure of inertia.
F=m*a.
Where is the "inertia" in that?
I see no such term.
Mass is mass. It very clearly has it's own unique units of measure.
You REALLY need to give up on this Google stuff.
BTW, No pecks of "inertia" there either.
======================================================================
======================================================================
http://www.ncsta.org/reflector/summer04/inertia.html
Inertia is the natural tendency of an object to maintain state of rest
or to remain in uniform motion in a straight line.
This is conservation of momentum. Mass. Vector motion. See
Classical Mechanics & Newton's laws.
It is the fundamental
property of matter where an object opposes being accelerated or
decelerated. Newton related concept of inertia to mass. Initially, he
called mass a quantity of matter, but later redefined it as the measure
of inertia. A more massive object has more inertia i.e., more resistance
to any change in its state of motion than a less massive object.
He was early on & speaking in relation to Galileo's statements and
(probably) the animistic churches.
Mass is mass.
In Classical Mechainics E=(m*v^2)/2.
I see no term for "inertia".
Per Einstein E=m*c^2.
I see no term for "inertia".
But in both I do seem to see mass.
BTW, P=2*E/v per Newton ...
======================================================================
======================================================================
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9051285
mass
in physics, quantitative measure of inertia, a fundamental property of
all matter.
Mass=mass. So what?
You can measure mass but not "inertia" (see above) it seems <G>.
======================================================================
======================================================================
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Physics_Study_Guide/Momentum
Mass (m) : Mass is a measure of inertia. (kg)
From the above "Inertia is not measured directly" &
"it is not said that a body has so many units of inertia."
Kg is a unit of mass.
======================================================================
======================================================================
http://www.cord.edu/dept/physics/p128/lecture99_10.html
Inertia is the tendency of an object to remain in constant velocity
motion.
Sounds like momentum & conservation laws .... & Newton's first law
about *motion* ..<G>.
Mass is a measure of inertia.
<Sheesh>
You keep finding bad/poorly written stuff with Google but grasp nothing.
======================================================================
In the future, please do your OWN homework.
I have no need.
Now, once again:
[
Found that peck of "inertia" yet?
Tell us again what it's supposed to be per the lint ...
Be clear, concise & *use your own words*.
Feel free to set some equations before us that show your claimed effect ..
BTW, Why is Newton's "First Law" about motion (and not pecks)?
]
And "Do not try to multiply independant variables".
--
Cliff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- References:
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Ivan
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Prev by Date: Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Next by Date: kovar
- Previous by thread: Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Next by thread: Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|