Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:27:30 GMT
Cliff wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:36:38 GMT, BottleBob <bottlbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cliff:
I guess we'll have to go through this exercise one more time.
Why? You don't seem to grasp any of it at all.
Did you not understand one word of my last post on the topic?
Clill:
I don't have any time right now, so this is not a complete response to
your post, just a short comment. Your statements are guesses &
conjecture unsupported by any outside evidence, as such they carry
little to no weight. Please re-respond with support for your "opinions"
from credible physics sites, texts, etc. Repeating WAG's doesn't really
go very far to validate your points.
--
BottleBob
http://home.earthlink.net/~bottlbob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- References:
- Re: OT The Politcal Brain - Confirmation bias
- From: Cliff
- Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: BottleBob
- Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- From: Cliff
- Re: OT The Politcal Brain - Confirmation bias
- Prev by Date: Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Next by Date: deburring cutter for backside of a hole
- Previous by thread: Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Next by thread: Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|